I think that you've taken this too far. We can't make blanket statements about peoples rights and expect them to be applicable in every situation. In this case, a legal authority made the decision to interrupt a service…
But, was anyone's personal data really on that server? If it's an anonymous emailing service I would think that just the service was disrupted.
I'm a student at the University of Pittsburgh. From that point of view, this seems like a perfectly fine action to take. The FBI agents may have disrupted service to a few hundred users, but these threats were affecting…
I think that you've taken this too far. We can't make blanket statements about peoples rights and expect them to be applicable in every situation. In this case, a legal authority made the decision to interrupt a service…
But, was anyone's personal data really on that server? If it's an anonymous emailing service I would think that just the service was disrupted.
I'm a student at the University of Pittsburgh. From that point of view, this seems like a perfectly fine action to take. The FBI agents may have disrupted service to a few hundred users, but these threats were affecting…