Semantics are hard. There's a long-running slow-burning debate in the Lojban community about the degree to which BPFK, a guiding body for Lojban, is expected to formalize the semantics and philosophy of the language.…
{mlatu} "kitty!" {oi mabla skami} "Ugh, fucking computers." {po'o fi'ure lo ro pipno ku zasti} "Only half of all pianos exist." {cicricfoi bartu} "It's a jungle out there." {lo se tsarainaitrusi'o ku ta'e na'e pensi}…
You missed the point, but it's a hard point. Suppose I utter {mi do tavla .i ba go'i}. {ba go'i} means "the previous utterance, logically, but with a future tense". English has no satisfactory translation for this…
I only read some of the first two parts of this dissertation. I wonder whether there are any good classes of learnable patterns. In, say, the continued fractions, or the decimal deals, there is a fine but essential line…
Semantics are hard. There's a long-running slow-burning debate in the Lojban community about the degree to which BPFK, a guiding body for Lojban, is expected to formalize the semantics and philosophy of the language.…
{mlatu} "kitty!" {oi mabla skami} "Ugh, fucking computers." {po'o fi'ure lo ro pipno ku zasti} "Only half of all pianos exist." {cicricfoi bartu} "It's a jungle out there." {lo se tsarainaitrusi'o ku ta'e na'e pensi}…
You missed the point, but it's a hard point. Suppose I utter {mi do tavla .i ba go'i}. {ba go'i} means "the previous utterance, logically, but with a future tense". English has no satisfactory translation for this…
I only read some of the first two parts of this dissertation. I wonder whether there are any good classes of learnable patterns. In, say, the continued fractions, or the decimal deals, there is a fine but essential line…