Thanks for taking the most uncharitable interpretation of what I wrote possible. It’s so productive.
Is it standard for people in the Andes to take offence at people taking pictures of them? I don’t know, maybe it is, haven’t been there. It is not in Europe.
If you avoid the slightest possibility of unpleasant and pointless confrontations, then you’re going to lead a very dull life. I sometimes photograph random people. Never has anyone had an issue with that. Sometimes…
Hopefully k is natural. ;)
It doesn’t matter which definition you pick. I e.g. had it defined axiomatically when I studied, i.e. we were given a list of properties which identify exp unambiguously and then we were given a proof of its existence.…
It’s great to hear. Thanks.
Are they going to drop RStudio? I very much prefer its Qt interface over whatever VSCode invented. It’s fast, has nice keyboard shortcuts, none of that pointless padding and it just feels great to use.
This has nothing to do with GCC being a first-class citizen in Linux. It’s a kernel feature. The kernel doesn’t care which compiler or debugger you’re using. You can dump core of any process regardless of the language…
You must not have seen Bloomberg Terminal then. Most devs on this forum wouldn’t be even able to build anything this performant and ergonomic.
> 100% branch coverage means that you've fundamentally covered all potential states your software can enter. No, it doesn’t. bool is_even(int n) { return true; } bool test_is_even() { return is_even(2); } 100% test…
And even if you do know what it does, it’s very impractical given that it’s a global option. Turning it on for selected portions of code would be a completely different game.
> It's still not a feature you can expect all implementations to have, so OCaml is not in a bad position there I think. The number of SML implementations supporting this feature is greater than the number of OCaml…
> In the first year of the University you write cpngruence with three horizontal lines. In the second, you just use two lines, aka an equal sign. Obviously in the next step you achieve enlightenment when you then write…
When would you use it? Emacs dired works fine on other platforms, which don’t have GNU ls on them, so I’m guessing by default it doesn’t run ls on its own.
You can see part of its black beak on the right hand side.
9pt == 12px on the web. You can check that in Web Inspector in computed styles. Alternatively: 1px = (1/96)in 1pt = (1/72)in = (1/72)*(96/72)*(72/96)in = (96/72)*(1/96)in = (4/3)*1px = (4/3)px 9pt = 9*1pt = 9*(4/3)px =…
It’s the opposite for me. I keep finding dumb bugs in Chromium, when it comes to correct website rendering and event handling (always regressions). Safari and Firefox on the other hand never have those issues. The only…
I’m not a fan of concatenating strings either. I was thinking about the MSVC/Pascal-style inline assembly here, which isn’t based on strings. Correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t think that you can guarantee a routine…
It seems that MSVC supports inline assembly only on 32-bit x86. For amd64 and ARM they moved entirely to intrinsics.
1. Justified text without hyphenation is a quick recipe for very odd-looking uneven spacing, like in your example. 2. The inset used by the headings is jarringly big. 3. The text is too wide for comfortable reading. 4.…
You just need a toggle to comply with the rules, so that the user decides what they’ll see. One example is Flickr. Another is Tumblr. They both have toggles for explicit content.
App Store allows and contains plenty apps with NSFW content.
What a world we live in that allowing NSFW content is seen as desperation, while monetisation through ads isn’t.
> In this case, by adding "no_inline" to both the version and pre-initializing the exception object, the difference in performance on my machine decreased to 2.8 times from 22 times. That’s not a realistic benchmark…
In said benchmark the function threw an exception 3906 / 1000000 = 0.4% of the time and it was from 10 to 32 times (edit: 73.2 times on my Mac Mini M1) slower on average. 9% would be much worse. EDIT: updated the ratio…
Thanks for taking the most uncharitable interpretation of what I wrote possible. It’s so productive.
Is it standard for people in the Andes to take offence at people taking pictures of them? I don’t know, maybe it is, haven’t been there. It is not in Europe.
If you avoid the slightest possibility of unpleasant and pointless confrontations, then you’re going to lead a very dull life. I sometimes photograph random people. Never has anyone had an issue with that. Sometimes…
Hopefully k is natural. ;)
It doesn’t matter which definition you pick. I e.g. had it defined axiomatically when I studied, i.e. we were given a list of properties which identify exp unambiguously and then we were given a proof of its existence.…
It’s great to hear. Thanks.
Are they going to drop RStudio? I very much prefer its Qt interface over whatever VSCode invented. It’s fast, has nice keyboard shortcuts, none of that pointless padding and it just feels great to use.
This has nothing to do with GCC being a first-class citizen in Linux. It’s a kernel feature. The kernel doesn’t care which compiler or debugger you’re using. You can dump core of any process regardless of the language…
You must not have seen Bloomberg Terminal then. Most devs on this forum wouldn’t be even able to build anything this performant and ergonomic.
> 100% branch coverage means that you've fundamentally covered all potential states your software can enter. No, it doesn’t. bool is_even(int n) { return true; } bool test_is_even() { return is_even(2); } 100% test…
And even if you do know what it does, it’s very impractical given that it’s a global option. Turning it on for selected portions of code would be a completely different game.
> It's still not a feature you can expect all implementations to have, so OCaml is not in a bad position there I think. The number of SML implementations supporting this feature is greater than the number of OCaml…
> In the first year of the University you write cpngruence with three horizontal lines. In the second, you just use two lines, aka an equal sign. Obviously in the next step you achieve enlightenment when you then write…
When would you use it? Emacs dired works fine on other platforms, which don’t have GNU ls on them, so I’m guessing by default it doesn’t run ls on its own.
You can see part of its black beak on the right hand side.
9pt == 12px on the web. You can check that in Web Inspector in computed styles. Alternatively: 1px = (1/96)in 1pt = (1/72)in = (1/72)*(96/72)*(72/96)in = (96/72)*(1/96)in = (4/3)*1px = (4/3)px 9pt = 9*1pt = 9*(4/3)px =…
It’s the opposite for me. I keep finding dumb bugs in Chromium, when it comes to correct website rendering and event handling (always regressions). Safari and Firefox on the other hand never have those issues. The only…
I’m not a fan of concatenating strings either. I was thinking about the MSVC/Pascal-style inline assembly here, which isn’t based on strings. Correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t think that you can guarantee a routine…
It seems that MSVC supports inline assembly only on 32-bit x86. For amd64 and ARM they moved entirely to intrinsics.
1. Justified text without hyphenation is a quick recipe for very odd-looking uneven spacing, like in your example. 2. The inset used by the headings is jarringly big. 3. The text is too wide for comfortable reading. 4.…
You just need a toggle to comply with the rules, so that the user decides what they’ll see. One example is Flickr. Another is Tumblr. They both have toggles for explicit content.
App Store allows and contains plenty apps with NSFW content.
What a world we live in that allowing NSFW content is seen as desperation, while monetisation through ads isn’t.
> In this case, by adding "no_inline" to both the version and pre-initializing the exception object, the difference in performance on my machine decreased to 2.8 times from 22 times. That’s not a realistic benchmark…
In said benchmark the function threw an exception 3906 / 1000000 = 0.4% of the time and it was from 10 to 32 times (edit: 73.2 times on my Mac Mini M1) slower on average. 9% would be much worse. EDIT: updated the ratio…