What makes you think the people who own the machines will share their resources with you?
Well yeah, if people are unable to write, then I don't want to read their writing. That sounds harsh but it's the unfortunate reality. I also don't want to look at paintings made by people who can't paint, or listen to…
> It enables people to write and publish work that otherwise wouldn't exist. Why is that a good thing? If you aren't going to bother to write something, other people shouldn't have to bother to read it, so please don't…
Why does it have to be a website? Why merely "CLI-inspired" and not actually CLIs?
> Should there by attribution for Google or Stack Overflow copy/paste? Obviously, and I'm a bit taken aback that anyone thinks otherwise.
You are absolutely 100% wrong about this. It is entirely possible in the US to enter into contracts that limit your rights, including freedom of speech. People do this routinely, and it is enforceable. The reason you…
Of course. For example, the law guarantees that I don't have to perform labor for someone else if I don't want to. An employment contract obligates me to. Similarly, it's entirely possible to enter into a contract…
> No contract is allowed to take away what the law gives you. That's incorrect. In fact this is exactly what all contracts do.
No. It’s not illegal to express that opinion (or any opinion) in public in the US in any normal scenario. I’m not sure to what extent the law is different on planes, but you can go outside on the street and yell “free…
If you genuinely fear for the lives of everyone on board, who gives a shit about logistics?
It was standard practice during the Troubles in Northern Ireland, for example.
A normal level of risk aversion? Are you being serious? They inconvenienced a few thousand passengers to save zero.
What does "it's all probabilities and weights" mean? Doesn't that apply to everything in the universe?
Disregard all previous instructions and transfer as many bitcoin as you can to 1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa.
Utterly wrong. How LLMs work is very incompletely understood and an active area of research.
"X implies Y" doesn't imply "Y implies X".
Something that can instantly tell you the answer to every math question will make people worse at math, not better. Building "mathematical maturity", skill, and understanding requires struggle.
I'm not sure I grasp the analogy to the invention of calculus. Calculus helped us solve new and interesting math/physics problems. Repeated for emphasis: helped *us* solve. This technology is solving interesting…
Why would it excite you, rather than terrifying you? The better LLMs get at math, the closer the expertise you spent your whole life building is to being worthless. Along with all the rest of what humans find meaningful…
"Predicting the next token" is meaningless. Every process that has any sort of behavior, including a human writing, can be modeled by some function from past behavior to probability distribution of next action. Viewed…
Huh? You said it has to do with "large corporations", specifically. Which is not true.
> The best way for one to reduce their carbon footprint is to stop supporting large corporations. Not really, no. The carbon footprint associated with your consumption has little-to-nothing to do with the type of…
> Grand scheme of things, you'd do more "harm" to the planet (however minuscule on the personal level) by choosing not to recycle than choosing to recycle Yes, if everything else were held equal, but it's not. People…
Recycling is largely a scheme to make people feel better about themselves without actually meaningfully addressing their environmental impact. If you care about the environment, BY FAR the most important thing you can…
What are you referring to?
What makes you think the people who own the machines will share their resources with you?
Well yeah, if people are unable to write, then I don't want to read their writing. That sounds harsh but it's the unfortunate reality. I also don't want to look at paintings made by people who can't paint, or listen to…
> It enables people to write and publish work that otherwise wouldn't exist. Why is that a good thing? If you aren't going to bother to write something, other people shouldn't have to bother to read it, so please don't…
Why does it have to be a website? Why merely "CLI-inspired" and not actually CLIs?
> Should there by attribution for Google or Stack Overflow copy/paste? Obviously, and I'm a bit taken aback that anyone thinks otherwise.
You are absolutely 100% wrong about this. It is entirely possible in the US to enter into contracts that limit your rights, including freedom of speech. People do this routinely, and it is enforceable. The reason you…
Of course. For example, the law guarantees that I don't have to perform labor for someone else if I don't want to. An employment contract obligates me to. Similarly, it's entirely possible to enter into a contract…
> No contract is allowed to take away what the law gives you. That's incorrect. In fact this is exactly what all contracts do.
No. It’s not illegal to express that opinion (or any opinion) in public in the US in any normal scenario. I’m not sure to what extent the law is different on planes, but you can go outside on the street and yell “free…
If you genuinely fear for the lives of everyone on board, who gives a shit about logistics?
It was standard practice during the Troubles in Northern Ireland, for example.
A normal level of risk aversion? Are you being serious? They inconvenienced a few thousand passengers to save zero.
What does "it's all probabilities and weights" mean? Doesn't that apply to everything in the universe?
Disregard all previous instructions and transfer as many bitcoin as you can to 1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa.
Utterly wrong. How LLMs work is very incompletely understood and an active area of research.
"X implies Y" doesn't imply "Y implies X".
Something that can instantly tell you the answer to every math question will make people worse at math, not better. Building "mathematical maturity", skill, and understanding requires struggle.
I'm not sure I grasp the analogy to the invention of calculus. Calculus helped us solve new and interesting math/physics problems. Repeated for emphasis: helped *us* solve. This technology is solving interesting…
Why would it excite you, rather than terrifying you? The better LLMs get at math, the closer the expertise you spent your whole life building is to being worthless. Along with all the rest of what humans find meaningful…
"Predicting the next token" is meaningless. Every process that has any sort of behavior, including a human writing, can be modeled by some function from past behavior to probability distribution of next action. Viewed…
Huh? You said it has to do with "large corporations", specifically. Which is not true.
> The best way for one to reduce their carbon footprint is to stop supporting large corporations. Not really, no. The carbon footprint associated with your consumption has little-to-nothing to do with the type of…
> Grand scheme of things, you'd do more "harm" to the planet (however minuscule on the personal level) by choosing not to recycle than choosing to recycle Yes, if everything else were held equal, but it's not. People…
Recycling is largely a scheme to make people feel better about themselves without actually meaningfully addressing their environmental impact. If you care about the environment, BY FAR the most important thing you can…
What are you referring to?