A one with a long history of talking bullshit with nothing to back it (other than "anonymous sources").
So you "believe" it was the USA based on what, again?
I will definitely take a random substack blog more seriously. After all, he is citing "unnamed sources"! Very credible!
So let me understand this clearly, all of this is based on an "unnamed source"? How does this have even an ounce of legitimacy and isn't just mere fiction?
A one with a long history of talking bullshit with nothing to back it (other than "anonymous sources").
So you "believe" it was the USA based on what, again?
I will definitely take a random substack blog more seriously. After all, he is citing "unnamed sources"! Very credible!
So let me understand this clearly, all of this is based on an "unnamed source"? How does this have even an ounce of legitimacy and isn't just mere fiction?