You just think my perspective is invalid and so you read manipulative or deceptive intent into my actions. > The focus should be solely on the Science and nothing else. You don't get to decide how the discussion goes.…
This is offensive and uncalled for. If the admins see your comment, they will tell you that comments like this get you banned. I don't agree with ThrowawayR2 but they were respectful; I doubt they appreciate their views…
> Not exactly in the spirit of intellectual curiosity HN tries to foster. I could not disagree more. If you don't see how a comprehensive, warts and all look at the man's life and legacy doesn't add context and foster…
Let's be clear about this video; the "sham legacy" is the commercialization/exploitation of Feynman's legacy after he died. Feynman was not a charlatan. Collier doesn't claim he is. She talks about the very real…
You just think my perspective is invalid and so you read manipulative or deceptive intent into my actions. > The focus should be solely on the Science and nothing else. You don't get to decide how the discussion goes.…
This is offensive and uncalled for. If the admins see your comment, they will tell you that comments like this get you banned. I don't agree with ThrowawayR2 but they were respectful; I doubt they appreciate their views…
> Not exactly in the spirit of intellectual curiosity HN tries to foster. I could not disagree more. If you don't see how a comprehensive, warts and all look at the man's life and legacy doesn't add context and foster…
Let's be clear about this video; the "sham legacy" is the commercialization/exploitation of Feynman's legacy after he died. Feynman was not a charlatan. Collier doesn't claim he is. She talks about the very real…