I believe they're arguing AI manufacturers and developers are the people primarily aware of the risks, and not random users necessarily. If OpenAI staff runs an ExploitBench knowing the risks, and it hacks into HF, they…
Gave the repo a once over: Self hosting [of the whole application in general] is a first-class citizen of the project, and the AI features are both: a. completely optional/disable-able and b. Self hosted llm friendly,…
SOTA LLM specific compression achieves around ~54%! https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06252v3
While I would like to believe you, doesn't this legal document linked by the article show that, in at least one of the cases, the author WAS trying to apply with himself, "Mr. Allen", as the author? And not the AI?…
If SCOTUS is saying that AI works, even those co-authored by humans, are not eligible for copyright/patenting; Doesn't that mean any code-base that uses AI generated code does not have an implicit copyright holder? And…
I believe they're arguing AI manufacturers and developers are the people primarily aware of the risks, and not random users necessarily. If OpenAI staff runs an ExploitBench knowing the risks, and it hacks into HF, they…
Gave the repo a once over: Self hosting [of the whole application in general] is a first-class citizen of the project, and the AI features are both: a. completely optional/disable-able and b. Self hosted llm friendly,…
SOTA LLM specific compression achieves around ~54%! https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06252v3
While I would like to believe you, doesn't this legal document linked by the article show that, in at least one of the cases, the author WAS trying to apply with himself, "Mr. Allen", as the author? And not the AI?…
If SCOTUS is saying that AI works, even those co-authored by humans, are not eligible for copyright/patenting; Doesn't that mean any code-base that uses AI generated code does not have an implicit copyright holder? And…