The change from python 2.6 to 3.3 would probably affect some plugins, so one could reason that, by adding the "3.0" tag, plugin creators would more easily accept the need for porting.
Underpants could be a synonym for underwear, in which case it could make sense: you'd like to keep you fingerprint private on the web, and your underwear private in real life.
Would there be any possibility for the addition of native Long numbers to JavaScript, or is this, due to some nature of the language, something that can't, or shouldn't, be included?
The change from python 2.6 to 3.3 would probably affect some plugins, so one could reason that, by adding the "3.0" tag, plugin creators would more easily accept the need for porting.
Underpants could be a synonym for underwear, in which case it could make sense: you'd like to keep you fingerprint private on the web, and your underwear private in real life.
Would there be any possibility for the addition of native Long numbers to JavaScript, or is this, due to some nature of the language, something that can't, or shouldn't, be included?