>In conclusion, your entire comment is a collection of the very worst, lazy and dishonest arguments and excuses for advertising. And yet you couldn't address any of them without dodging the material part of the argument…
I just flat out disagree with most of the premises you have shared here. Also I don't understand how something can be wrong or right in an 'academic sense' but fine: >They distort the product market as they favour those…
This just isn't true though. Or at least I don't see where you're coming from. You might see ads as intrusive, or getting you to spend money on something you don't want to spend money on... but that's not how many…
Sure thing. Your assumption that "it was smashed in the first place" is based on a news report, my assumption being that you are not a Gaza power station employee. In a case where something was fixed nearly a year ahead…
Which is now up and running a shocking 46 weeks ahead of schedule. Don't believe everything you read.
>In conclusion, your entire comment is a collection of the very worst, lazy and dishonest arguments and excuses for advertising. And yet you couldn't address any of them without dodging the material part of the argument…
I just flat out disagree with most of the premises you have shared here. Also I don't understand how something can be wrong or right in an 'academic sense' but fine: >They distort the product market as they favour those…
This just isn't true though. Or at least I don't see where you're coming from. You might see ads as intrusive, or getting you to spend money on something you don't want to spend money on... but that's not how many…
Sure thing. Your assumption that "it was smashed in the first place" is based on a news report, my assumption being that you are not a Gaza power station employee. In a case where something was fixed nearly a year ahead…
Which is now up and running a shocking 46 weeks ahead of schedule. Don't believe everything you read.