> Ah, the brand new account created just to push against an antisexist position suddenly has well-developed opinions on the history and the purpose of this website. What a surprise! I copy and pasted the intent from the…
>I don't have to define anything. I don't have to rebut anything. Certainly not. The request for a definition was meant to imply I can’t talk to the claim about “social accountability,” not knowing your definition.…
> Yes, it matters whether you are owning your words. Well, clearly, superficial things to the actual content of the discussion like who I am, matters to you. A blanket statement that "it matters," is too reductive. >…
>No. It is the same discussion, just revised for fancier modern science. You seem to be missing the nuance of distribution vs every individual. To me, this is a big distinction. >"I, a man, have noticed a possible fact…
> It is only hard to believe if you are entirely unfamiliar with the history of this discussion. Completely disagree. The crux of most historical discussions were based on ability and was blanketed to all individual…
> Ah, the brand new account created just to push against an antisexist position suddenly has well-developed opinions on the history and the purpose of this website. What a surprise! I copy and pasted the intent from the…
>I don't have to define anything. I don't have to rebut anything. Certainly not. The request for a definition was meant to imply I can’t talk to the claim about “social accountability,” not knowing your definition.…
> Yes, it matters whether you are owning your words. Well, clearly, superficial things to the actual content of the discussion like who I am, matters to you. A blanket statement that "it matters," is too reductive. >…
>No. It is the same discussion, just revised for fancier modern science. You seem to be missing the nuance of distribution vs every individual. To me, this is a big distinction. >"I, a man, have noticed a possible fact…
> It is only hard to believe if you are entirely unfamiliar with the history of this discussion. Completely disagree. The crux of most historical discussions were based on ability and was blanketed to all individual…