I've been seeing this subject (bad size perceptions when using Mercator projection) come up a lot as a topic the past year or two. What gives? Didn't anyone ever see a globe when they were a kid?
If you must have a maxlength, please be sensible. I've seen plenty of sites use 12 as max length - which is really not that much. Also, requirements to what characters must be used (at least one number, at least one…
The two way binding can be so useful though. The best example I've seen was an array of coordinates bound to a directive that used D3.js to visualise it. There were some special function you could call that would affect…
First thought of April fools. Now I think this might actually be useful as a data mining application.
Considering the situation, doesn't it always seem more like trying to suck up than genuine?
In my (limited) experience, any company that is so obsessed with social tends to be filled with idiots.
Only reason I clicked this link is because the title was so ridiculous I expected satire. I don't even bother clicking links like "X ways to..." or "Y reasons to" or "Z people who". These are pretty much always useless…
What a lousy article. It fails to produce any proof or specifics (funnily enough exactly what he accuses the video of). It doesn't go beyond saying "it's wrong because I say so". Then it throws in some buzzwords which…
I've been seeing this subject (bad size perceptions when using Mercator projection) come up a lot as a topic the past year or two. What gives? Didn't anyone ever see a globe when they were a kid?
If you must have a maxlength, please be sensible. I've seen plenty of sites use 12 as max length - which is really not that much. Also, requirements to what characters must be used (at least one number, at least one…
The two way binding can be so useful though. The best example I've seen was an array of coordinates bound to a directive that used D3.js to visualise it. There were some special function you could call that would affect…
First thought of April fools. Now I think this might actually be useful as a data mining application.
Considering the situation, doesn't it always seem more like trying to suck up than genuine?
In my (limited) experience, any company that is so obsessed with social tends to be filled with idiots.
Only reason I clicked this link is because the title was so ridiculous I expected satire. I don't even bother clicking links like "X ways to..." or "Y reasons to" or "Z people who". These are pretty much always useless…
What a lousy article. It fails to produce any proof or specifics (funnily enough exactly what he accuses the video of). It doesn't go beyond saying "it's wrong because I say so". Then it throws in some buzzwords which…