It's done at both side of the graph, so it makes 0.06 :-) But that's not the point. It's the principle. If you present a graph based on actual data (verified by many scientist) and you change the data however slightly…
Did you read the first couple of links in the article? On the day the original publication from DM came, we already debunked it, pointing to the longer time period:…
It's done at both side of the graph, so it makes 0.06 :-) But that's not the point. It's the principle. If you present a graph based on actual data (verified by many scientist) and you change the data however slightly…
Did you read the first couple of links in the article? On the day the original publication from DM came, we already debunked it, pointing to the longer time period:…