>The way I see this, if we happen to have greater intelligences working for our common good, we would be able to solve any problem better than a human could - including a possible problem of feeling useless. That's…
Are you looking forward to drinking beer for the rest of your life?
But once AI becomes more intelligent than humans, every conceivable role will definitionally be better filled by that AI than by actual humans.
Why am I the only person who's terrified rather than excited by every new incremental progression of AI? Do you guys actually look forward to the day when humans are made obsolete? PS: This scientist seems to be…
I think that you have to distinguish between wars in which the outcome is uncertain—that is, wars in which real risk to both sides is present—and wars that are essentially a big guy beating up a little guy. I agree that…
Then "immorality" is so prevalent that calling something immoral is pointless.
>The way I see this, if we happen to have greater intelligences working for our common good, we would be able to solve any problem better than a human could - including a possible problem of feeling useless. That's…
Are you looking forward to drinking beer for the rest of your life?
But once AI becomes more intelligent than humans, every conceivable role will definitionally be better filled by that AI than by actual humans.
Why am I the only person who's terrified rather than excited by every new incremental progression of AI? Do you guys actually look forward to the day when humans are made obsolete? PS: This scientist seems to be…
I think that you have to distinguish between wars in which the outcome is uncertain—that is, wars in which real risk to both sides is present—and wars that are essentially a big guy beating up a little guy. I agree that…
Then "immorality" is so prevalent that calling something immoral is pointless.