While I do believe how many stars a repo has doesn’t represent the worthiness or sth, still IMO, exploiting nondev people by bribing them to give a star for the repo is quite an “uncool” thing to do.
Well, not actually. it's more like bribing people in an exploitative method. Think of making multiple falsy accounts only to give an upvote to the repo.
Because of their wrong KPI system. The owner of the repo previously said that their work will be evaluated by the number of stars.
While I do believe how many stars a repo has doesn’t represent the worthiness or sth, still IMO, exploiting nondev people by bribing them to give a star for the repo is quite an “uncool” thing to do.
Well, not actually. it's more like bribing people in an exploitative method. Think of making multiple falsy accounts only to give an upvote to the repo.
Because of their wrong KPI system. The owner of the repo previously said that their work will be evaluated by the number of stars.