A writer hired to write the wording on Google's websites could submit a change that rot13s every word on Google's web properties. This would not be against the law, additionally it would be exactly what the employee was…
Also the people arguing for giving the employee a "talking to" instead of firing I think are not considering the game theory aspect to this. If the precedent is "a talking to" with future offenses resulting in a firing,…
If the employee had added a message, "You have the constitutional right to keep and bear arms" when employees visited cabelas.com, would you call it a political message? Both are simply informing people of their rights.
A writer hired to write the wording on Google's websites could submit a change that rot13s every word on Google's web properties. This would not be against the law, additionally it would be exactly what the employee was…
Also the people arguing for giving the employee a "talking to" instead of firing I think are not considering the game theory aspect to this. If the precedent is "a talking to" with future offenses resulting in a firing,…
If the employee had added a message, "You have the constitutional right to keep and bear arms" when employees visited cabelas.com, would you call it a political message? Both are simply informing people of their rights.