Oh, I just assumed that it was multiple submits concatenated to make the log readable for a news article.
I absolutely would prefer pain to boredom. I'm not afraid of being alone with my thoughts, but I am terrified of boredom. With the shock, I can totally see myself locked in a room with the device and trying to see if I…
I'm certain I didn't. The article asks the question about spreading, and that includes all vectors and scenarios. Spreading, is all about reaching and establishing an infected base. As far as if ebola can get TO the…
I do, I hate when I do it. It also doesn't add to the conversation. Especially when I do so on items that are questionable, as this one is. What bothers me most is that the level of snark I use is dependant not on the…
Explain please?
Maybe somewhere in the middle, but fair point. I have my bias for the style change, though that was a distraction from my point. It's premature, and in it's current form, doesn't add much value.
I wouldn't call this a BDD framework yet. It's speckled with both standard assertions and semantic assertions, and an "It" function that simply takes a block and a string. I can replicate this with using underscores in…
Yea, that's how conversation works. Someone posts an article, then clever people talk about it. Some agree, some give experiences, some add additional facts and resources, and other people offer counter arguments. This…
I once thought that I could tell my children that I was born in a world without the internet. But if governments and corporations keep on this path, my children won't have one either.
I suspect the 0 is in err.
That's a fantastic question, and one that I really like to know the answer to, but not the question I replied to. It is indeed what they removed, which caused the problem. And the diet they ate was also "plant based".…
Oh, they should have more. User assumes all risks, and the content is not guaranteed to be non-pornographic in nature, we absolve ourselves should your head explode, yadda, yadda. Okay, maybe a little out there, but a…
I don't understand.
Considering it states exactly that in the article in two places, I's say it's a safe assumption.
Oh, I just assumed that it was multiple submits concatenated to make the log readable for a news article.
I absolutely would prefer pain to boredom. I'm not afraid of being alone with my thoughts, but I am terrified of boredom. With the shock, I can totally see myself locked in a room with the device and trying to see if I…
I'm certain I didn't. The article asks the question about spreading, and that includes all vectors and scenarios. Spreading, is all about reaching and establishing an infected base. As far as if ebola can get TO the…
I do, I hate when I do it. It also doesn't add to the conversation. Especially when I do so on items that are questionable, as this one is. What bothers me most is that the level of snark I use is dependant not on the…
Explain please?
Maybe somewhere in the middle, but fair point. I have my bias for the style change, though that was a distraction from my point. It's premature, and in it's current form, doesn't add much value.
I wouldn't call this a BDD framework yet. It's speckled with both standard assertions and semantic assertions, and an "It" function that simply takes a block and a string. I can replicate this with using underscores in…
Yea, that's how conversation works. Someone posts an article, then clever people talk about it. Some agree, some give experiences, some add additional facts and resources, and other people offer counter arguments. This…
I once thought that I could tell my children that I was born in a world without the internet. But if governments and corporations keep on this path, my children won't have one either.
I suspect the 0 is in err.
That's a fantastic question, and one that I really like to know the answer to, but not the question I replied to. It is indeed what they removed, which caused the problem. And the diet they ate was also "plant based".…
Oh, they should have more. User assumes all risks, and the content is not guaranteed to be non-pornographic in nature, we absolve ourselves should your head explode, yadda, yadda. Okay, maybe a little out there, but a…
I don't understand.
Considering it states exactly that in the article in two places, I's say it's a safe assumption.