I'd like to inform you that you have bad taste and your post doesn't have anything to do with the article.
He doesn't have to have the private key, only a private key that was signed by any of the hundreds (counting intermediate CAs, thousands?) CAs trusted by his browser.
Your question is essentially "why is there a difference between theory and practice?".
That would be because GNU decided that man pages weren't good enough for them and decided to use info pages.
Doesn't seem to support backquotes? For example for x in `ls ~/foo`; do echo $x; done doesn't yield anything remotely interesting.
> this is typically the end game for capitalism and globalisation Say what?
tl;dr if you don't know what you're doing, you don't know what you're doing.
Game programmers are weird.
Java.
What the fuck are you talking about?
Do you have any idea how stupid you sound?
Good. Please keep them there.
That's just beyond retarded. I weep when people have been conditioned by Canonical (and Microsoft) to accept this.
"Nobel" in economic "science".
I disagree. A 182cm (6ft) person can weigh only 82 kg (~180lbs) to be not considered overweight. If you have any amount of muscle and don't have a single digit bodyfat percentage, you're easily overweight according to…
> as a simple example, recumbent cycles are faster under many conditions. I highly doubt that. Everybody knows that ugly bikes are slow, and recumbents are as ugly as they come. /s
> This right here is why security will never be mainstream, because consumers value convenience over the ability for their browser not to run arbitrary code. You say that as if it's a bad a thing.
It took me a while to realize that it didn't mean writing code that ran aboard an airplane, but code that was written while on an airplane. Somehow the latter didn't even cross my mind as something that could be…
Huh? Of course it is a feature. My point is that if something as innocent looking as property access can be an arbitrary method call, it may make understanding a piece of code more difficult. From the point of view of…
Portability, memory safety, speed of compilation, retaining the sanity of developers.
Somehow I'm tempted to click the "report abuse" button.
This seems more accurate to me than the OP.
Maybe they should make custom cleaning brushes that are tailored to each tooth-brush they produce.
Uhh, in which universe are you living where Ubuntu didn't forcibly end Gnome desktop?
One example I can think of is searching for matching documents with some other method (on the server side), and then searching inside each document with this method.
I'd like to inform you that you have bad taste and your post doesn't have anything to do with the article.
He doesn't have to have the private key, only a private key that was signed by any of the hundreds (counting intermediate CAs, thousands?) CAs trusted by his browser.
Your question is essentially "why is there a difference between theory and practice?".
That would be because GNU decided that man pages weren't good enough for them and decided to use info pages.
Doesn't seem to support backquotes? For example for x in `ls ~/foo`; do echo $x; done doesn't yield anything remotely interesting.
> this is typically the end game for capitalism and globalisation Say what?
tl;dr if you don't know what you're doing, you don't know what you're doing.
Game programmers are weird.
Java.
What the fuck are you talking about?
Do you have any idea how stupid you sound?
Good. Please keep them there.
That's just beyond retarded. I weep when people have been conditioned by Canonical (and Microsoft) to accept this.
"Nobel" in economic "science".
I disagree. A 182cm (6ft) person can weigh only 82 kg (~180lbs) to be not considered overweight. If you have any amount of muscle and don't have a single digit bodyfat percentage, you're easily overweight according to…
> as a simple example, recumbent cycles are faster under many conditions. I highly doubt that. Everybody knows that ugly bikes are slow, and recumbents are as ugly as they come. /s
> This right here is why security will never be mainstream, because consumers value convenience over the ability for their browser not to run arbitrary code. You say that as if it's a bad a thing.
It took me a while to realize that it didn't mean writing code that ran aboard an airplane, but code that was written while on an airplane. Somehow the latter didn't even cross my mind as something that could be…
Huh? Of course it is a feature. My point is that if something as innocent looking as property access can be an arbitrary method call, it may make understanding a piece of code more difficult. From the point of view of…
Portability, memory safety, speed of compilation, retaining the sanity of developers.
Somehow I'm tempted to click the "report abuse" button.
This seems more accurate to me than the OP.
Maybe they should make custom cleaning brushes that are tailored to each tooth-brush they produce.
Uhh, in which universe are you living where Ubuntu didn't forcibly end Gnome desktop?
One example I can think of is searching for matching documents with some other method (on the server side), and then searching inside each document with this method.