It wouldn't be a "grant" if the user didn't have a choice of not taking it. Consider if somewhere in the repo there was a file called GOATS which conditioned the right to use react on having goats sacrificed to facebook…
They assert it applies even if you are suing facebook for infringing on your hardware / biotech / business model patent. In my non-lawyer understanding the existence of the patent grant changes nothing in those…
<not a lawyer> In particular my reading is that the BSD license alone gives anyone an irrevocable right to use, modify and redistribute the software providing only the conditions in that license are met. So one can…
This discussion just goes to show again the extent to which the tech community allowed itself to be gaslighted into accepting that: 1. Anything about react is patentable. 2. Licensing of unspecified patents is a thing.…
It wouldn't be a "grant" if the user didn't have a choice of not taking it. Consider if somewhere in the repo there was a file called GOATS which conditioned the right to use react on having goats sacrificed to facebook…
They assert it applies even if you are suing facebook for infringing on your hardware / biotech / business model patent. In my non-lawyer understanding the existence of the patent grant changes nothing in those…
<not a lawyer> In particular my reading is that the BSD license alone gives anyone an irrevocable right to use, modify and redistribute the software providing only the conditions in that license are met. So one can…
This discussion just goes to show again the extent to which the tech community allowed itself to be gaslighted into accepting that: 1. Anything about react is patentable. 2. Licensing of unspecified patents is a thing.…