> Who defines what a "hate speech" is? Who defines what is murder and what is self-defence? You already know the answer to this. The legislature. Your first link is about police misconduct, not what the laws are or…
Nobody is talking about shirking any blame off. Maybe this is our disconnect. You think there must be one singular person to blame entirely. That if someone is held accountable for a consequence of their action, then no…
I don't disagree with you that Discord is the best option for voice chat now, but there was a godsend before it and that was Skype. It didn't have the equivalent of Discord “servers” but it finally solved the voice chat…
In the choice between being allowed to carry a gun (and having people with guns all around me) versus being offered free healthcare (and having healthier people all around me) I know not just which one I'd choose, but…
That is a very American perspective, which I like to think many people in the civilized world find irresponsible. (In the literal sense. You don't want to take responsibility for the consequences of your actions.)
It is a common misconception, partly intentionally perpetuated by the UK right-wing press, that people are arrested and jailed for making jokes or otherwise casually chatting on social media. If you dig deeper you'll…
Has anyone ever tracked down SolidGoldMagikarp and interviewed them? It's such a uniquely bizarre claim to fame.
How is it a strawman if I've seen plenty Marvel movies and report on my experiences?
I know that you copied this from the article, but isn't this part of the prompt wrong? > another instance of the same model should have a reasonable chance of recovering the secret after inspecting the SVG; The whole…
That watermarking is not something the LLM chooses to add, neither through training nor in response to any prompt. This article is about the choices LLMs make when explicitly told to hide messages.
Ah, now I see what you mean by distraction. I wholeheartedly agree with you.
I think we're in agreement except in mere terminology. I was disagreeing with the characterization as a “distraction”, but I was also saying that if techbros pay out something for the plebs and call it UBI then it's not…
Depending on how broadly or narrowly you define “profit”, your statement is either too weak to be useful, or false. If you define it so broadly that the hunter-gatherer inventing a spear for hunting more effectively is…
You're not wrong, but we should not absolve those who perpetuate the fairy tales from their share of the responsibility.
You're talking “always existed” too literally.
> If these tools could do your work, people would feel existential dread anyway. That is, if your entire self worth is tied to your work. I think we should consider moving away from that notion.
I'm not sure I agree. You make it sound like you think the idea of UBI is for the rich to pay it out to us, the plebs. That's us-vs-them thinking. The idea is for the society as a whole, democratically controlled by…
I'm a little confused; the article text implies an exciting battle for resources where the agents discover they can steal from each other, but looking through the transcript it seems that only one agent discovered that…
> I'd love to see data, but my intuition is that the average developer has access to dramatically better security reviews and far lower cost than ever. Where? If I ask Claude to do a “security review” of my software, it…
> I loathe LLM prose, no matter who posts it I don't know if it's even possible anymore to write a detailed, technical article without a swarm of people showing this reaction.
I had the same thought. This is honestly plagiarism.
It would have been nice if a replacement had been suggested.
Yes, and that might help some people who always bought the game, but it won't change the situation going forward is what I'm saying.
I don't think most Japanese speakers would characterize their language as having “four writing systems”. They would say three and not include Romaji in the count. This is not to say they don't use Romaji, but it's not…
> Is it because people think the topic is interesting but don't actually care about the content? I'm having difficulty seeing where you draw the line between “topic” and “content”. I found the article interesting as it…
> Who defines what a "hate speech" is? Who defines what is murder and what is self-defence? You already know the answer to this. The legislature. Your first link is about police misconduct, not what the laws are or…
Nobody is talking about shirking any blame off. Maybe this is our disconnect. You think there must be one singular person to blame entirely. That if someone is held accountable for a consequence of their action, then no…
I don't disagree with you that Discord is the best option for voice chat now, but there was a godsend before it and that was Skype. It didn't have the equivalent of Discord “servers” but it finally solved the voice chat…
In the choice between being allowed to carry a gun (and having people with guns all around me) versus being offered free healthcare (and having healthier people all around me) I know not just which one I'd choose, but…
That is a very American perspective, which I like to think many people in the civilized world find irresponsible. (In the literal sense. You don't want to take responsibility for the consequences of your actions.)
It is a common misconception, partly intentionally perpetuated by the UK right-wing press, that people are arrested and jailed for making jokes or otherwise casually chatting on social media. If you dig deeper you'll…
Has anyone ever tracked down SolidGoldMagikarp and interviewed them? It's such a uniquely bizarre claim to fame.
How is it a strawman if I've seen plenty Marvel movies and report on my experiences?
I know that you copied this from the article, but isn't this part of the prompt wrong? > another instance of the same model should have a reasonable chance of recovering the secret after inspecting the SVG; The whole…
That watermarking is not something the LLM chooses to add, neither through training nor in response to any prompt. This article is about the choices LLMs make when explicitly told to hide messages.
Ah, now I see what you mean by distraction. I wholeheartedly agree with you.
I think we're in agreement except in mere terminology. I was disagreeing with the characterization as a “distraction”, but I was also saying that if techbros pay out something for the plebs and call it UBI then it's not…
Depending on how broadly or narrowly you define “profit”, your statement is either too weak to be useful, or false. If you define it so broadly that the hunter-gatherer inventing a spear for hunting more effectively is…
You're not wrong, but we should not absolve those who perpetuate the fairy tales from their share of the responsibility.
You're talking “always existed” too literally.
> If these tools could do your work, people would feel existential dread anyway. That is, if your entire self worth is tied to your work. I think we should consider moving away from that notion.
I'm not sure I agree. You make it sound like you think the idea of UBI is for the rich to pay it out to us, the plebs. That's us-vs-them thinking. The idea is for the society as a whole, democratically controlled by…
I'm a little confused; the article text implies an exciting battle for resources where the agents discover they can steal from each other, but looking through the transcript it seems that only one agent discovered that…
> I'd love to see data, but my intuition is that the average developer has access to dramatically better security reviews and far lower cost than ever. Where? If I ask Claude to do a “security review” of my software, it…
> I loathe LLM prose, no matter who posts it I don't know if it's even possible anymore to write a detailed, technical article without a swarm of people showing this reaction.
I had the same thought. This is honestly plagiarism.
It would have been nice if a replacement had been suggested.
Yes, and that might help some people who always bought the game, but it won't change the situation going forward is what I'm saying.
I don't think most Japanese speakers would characterize their language as having “four writing systems”. They would say three and not include Romaji in the count. This is not to say they don't use Romaji, but it's not…
> Is it because people think the topic is interesting but don't actually care about the content? I'm having difficulty seeing where you draw the line between “topic” and “content”. I found the article interesting as it…