Why is BK trying to look so stupid. They appear to actually be for net-neutrality by showing a non-regulated BK that has a bunch of crazy things that no one would ever pay for like a $26 fast lane Whopper. It's scare…
So you are going to argue with statistical probability? It is our best determining factor. Have any better ideas? If you don't believe in using probability to determine risk. How about you hire a pedophile to babysit…
OF course they are substantially more likely to be incorrectly classified. They are in a group with far more risk. (this is simple statistics and probability) Interestingly, if this Algorithm was a human, they would be…
Why is BK trying to look so stupid. They appear to actually be for net-neutrality by showing a non-regulated BK that has a bunch of crazy things that no one would ever pay for like a $26 fast lane Whopper. It's scare…
So you are going to argue with statistical probability? It is our best determining factor. Have any better ideas? If you don't believe in using probability to determine risk. How about you hire a pedophile to babysit…
OF course they are substantially more likely to be incorrectly classified. They are in a group with far more risk. (this is simple statistics and probability) Interestingly, if this Algorithm was a human, they would be…