You have no idea if what input he had to the AI, he might designed the entire thing. But go it to present it nicely.
Standard corporate nonsense. Enron famously had integrity plastered across it's corporate walls as it's values when they got done for fraud.
80% of their orders come through the app
When I used to work there they used databricks not snowflake. So it gave me a bit wtf when i got the notification.
There used to be a few products like this in the early 2000s. Not a new idea at all.
That often means employers big budgets and training.
Game VC is called being a publisher.
I have feedback in the past that people don't like diagrams upfront, because it presents a finished solution.
Probably reducing its capabilities to make the new model look better.
Some of the worst team developers I have ever met, are people who presented at conferences a lot. It's ego thing.
It's not meant to give you complete coverage. It's meant to guide to meeting the acceptance criteria.
The average VC business is not very strong. They rely on power laws.
Normally when you give an unreasonable promise, or have to implement ugly hack then it is known about and explicit that is what is happening. The problems come when you make a unreasonable promise, but no one knows that.
Isn't fluid intelligence learning? and crystallized intelligence stuff you already know?
It's not one or the other. Those fit in spec driven development already. I have skills that integrate writing and implementing specs.
Promotion at most companies is competitive. So multiple people want the same role. So you need a sorting mechanism.
That's just a bad dev. Good devs don't think of just the happy path. My experience of QA as a quality focused dev has not been good.
Yes
And yet the tolerance for bad decisions is much higher in bigger companies. Make a bad decision at large company and simple intertia will keep you going. Make a bad decision in a small company and you're out of business.
They are talking swapping fields completely like going into plumbing. Not simply picking up new tech.
Intelligence scales with social skills. Unless you have a condition like autism which allows skewed development, which a lot software engineers do have.
This youtuber has the 9070XT working on the latest steamos https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_U6-R6XtCUQ&pp=ygUXZXRhIHBya....
I think that's changed recently. Recent release notes state it's added support for RDNA4
Lots of places are not like this. I work at a large tech company, at its not like this at all. My machine is not locked down. I can use vim or whatever ide/editor I want. We don't use scrum/safe, we're expected to…
When a lot of dotnet shops operate this way the difference is negligible. I'm not saying all dotnet places are like this, but they are common.
You have no idea if what input he had to the AI, he might designed the entire thing. But go it to present it nicely.
Standard corporate nonsense. Enron famously had integrity plastered across it's corporate walls as it's values when they got done for fraud.
80% of their orders come through the app
When I used to work there they used databricks not snowflake. So it gave me a bit wtf when i got the notification.
There used to be a few products like this in the early 2000s. Not a new idea at all.
That often means employers big budgets and training.
Game VC is called being a publisher.
I have feedback in the past that people don't like diagrams upfront, because it presents a finished solution.
Probably reducing its capabilities to make the new model look better.
Some of the worst team developers I have ever met, are people who presented at conferences a lot. It's ego thing.
It's not meant to give you complete coverage. It's meant to guide to meeting the acceptance criteria.
The average VC business is not very strong. They rely on power laws.
Normally when you give an unreasonable promise, or have to implement ugly hack then it is known about and explicit that is what is happening. The problems come when you make a unreasonable promise, but no one knows that.
Isn't fluid intelligence learning? and crystallized intelligence stuff you already know?
It's not one or the other. Those fit in spec driven development already. I have skills that integrate writing and implementing specs.
Promotion at most companies is competitive. So multiple people want the same role. So you need a sorting mechanism.
That's just a bad dev. Good devs don't think of just the happy path. My experience of QA as a quality focused dev has not been good.
Yes
And yet the tolerance for bad decisions is much higher in bigger companies. Make a bad decision at large company and simple intertia will keep you going. Make a bad decision in a small company and you're out of business.
They are talking swapping fields completely like going into plumbing. Not simply picking up new tech.
Intelligence scales with social skills. Unless you have a condition like autism which allows skewed development, which a lot software engineers do have.
This youtuber has the 9070XT working on the latest steamos https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_U6-R6XtCUQ&pp=ygUXZXRhIHBya....
I think that's changed recently. Recent release notes state it's added support for RDNA4
Lots of places are not like this. I work at a large tech company, at its not like this at all. My machine is not locked down. I can use vim or whatever ide/editor I want. We don't use scrum/safe, we're expected to…
When a lot of dotnet shops operate this way the difference is negligible. I'm not saying all dotnet places are like this, but they are common.