> knowing the answer everyone sees is wrong and everyone being incapable of thinking critically about it. That's what already happens when people read newspapers.
Contact a journalist friend and have them write a story about your blog post or tweet.
Instead of some reasonable time limit such as 14 years, we get big corporations that hoard copyright effectively for eternity, and big corporations that violate copyright instantly. It's the little guy whose work is…
> barely any use in real life outside of generating code. Reverse-engineering code. Finding vulnerabilities. Reviewing specifications.
I suspect that most anti-AI articles are generated by AI these days.
Or specify that it's "open" as in "OpenAI" (i.e. not at all), not as in "open source".
Long ago I have read somewhere a good method to prevent this: When doing a proof of concept, always use ugly black-and-white buttons and icons. That makes it obvious even to the non-technical people that it is not…
Is it great to have both. The AI-pedias will probably contain a lot of hallucinations, but also the information that gets removed from Wikipedia (by deletionists, or by editors with an agenda). Neither is reliable, but…
> our governments work for us and with almost infinite cheap robot labour and national resources the focus should be on society and not enriching some fucking crooks. But also, with almost infinite cheap robot labour…
In my experience, at some places you can also have both: a job where during some weeks there is little to do, but you have to spend 40 hours sitting in the office regardless, and during some weeks there is so much to do…
> It probably has something to do with the underlying realities of banana production, supply, and demand. Such as the fact that you don't need the banana in order to survive, so they have little blackmailing power over…
> their benefits are quite visible and concentrated to those who are in them, and their costs are spread out and invisible In your opinion, is the 8-hour workday an exclusive benefit for the insiders, or the invisible…
Optionally, because after the 80 are fired, the remaining 20 will think twice before asking for a raise.
I could imagine that someone's plan could be like this: "Our current company has more managers than developers, and the software development is very ineffective because we spend a lot of time in meetings, doing various…
Some companies start with a temporary idea and later pivot to a new one. For example, I know a few companies which at the beginning were just body shops, but the long-term plan was to develop their own projects after…
Heresy! Feynman was the last Prophet of Physics, no one can ever figure out the things he didn't know. If people could discover things after Feynman, those things could get into textbooks, and then mere students could…
Better, call the company that uses PHP most, and tell them than unless they give you $100K a year, you will sunset PHP. (You need to address one specific company, because if you address two, neither will give you a…
Kinda yes, but... it's like all those Nigerian scams. Yes, people outside of Nigeria can do them too, and sometimes they do. And yet. Similarly, PhDs from Africa or China... if you work in a scientific journal, you know…
Consider what happens if you have a community that is very nice, very trusting, and open to everyone including complete strangers who behave weirdly. At the beginning it can be a nice place. Until the first abuser finds…
> Management decides the process, management decides who to hire, management assigns the roles and management decides how urgent the work is. Also, management decides whom to blame. :)
When a small team sits close to each other, you can simply say: "hey guys, anyone got time to check my PR?". In a gigantic org, you can message them on Teams, but everyone keeps getting messages on Teams constantly so…
This sounds like the tragedy of commons. If someone arranges a meeting with you, it is more likely that you will work on their project afterwards, because you have already been thinking about it during the meeting, you…
> removing everything they cannot grasp or simply deem uninteresting again. As an example, there is an American author B.B.Alston whose popular books for children were translated into dozen languages. He has a page on…
This article only talks about some of Wikipedia's problems, but it was the best source I could find quickly: https://www.tracingwoodgrains.com/p/reliable-sources-how-wik...
You were supposed to say that it was always wrong, and that all those "100% AI" blogs about mindfulness are genuine products of humans who suddenly got way more productive recently for reasons completely unrelated to…
> knowing the answer everyone sees is wrong and everyone being incapable of thinking critically about it. That's what already happens when people read newspapers.
Contact a journalist friend and have them write a story about your blog post or tweet.
Instead of some reasonable time limit such as 14 years, we get big corporations that hoard copyright effectively for eternity, and big corporations that violate copyright instantly. It's the little guy whose work is…
> barely any use in real life outside of generating code. Reverse-engineering code. Finding vulnerabilities. Reviewing specifications.
I suspect that most anti-AI articles are generated by AI these days.
Or specify that it's "open" as in "OpenAI" (i.e. not at all), not as in "open source".
Long ago I have read somewhere a good method to prevent this: When doing a proof of concept, always use ugly black-and-white buttons and icons. That makes it obvious even to the non-technical people that it is not…
Is it great to have both. The AI-pedias will probably contain a lot of hallucinations, but also the information that gets removed from Wikipedia (by deletionists, or by editors with an agenda). Neither is reliable, but…
> our governments work for us and with almost infinite cheap robot labour and national resources the focus should be on society and not enriching some fucking crooks. But also, with almost infinite cheap robot labour…
In my experience, at some places you can also have both: a job where during some weeks there is little to do, but you have to spend 40 hours sitting in the office regardless, and during some weeks there is so much to do…
> It probably has something to do with the underlying realities of banana production, supply, and demand. Such as the fact that you don't need the banana in order to survive, so they have little blackmailing power over…
> their benefits are quite visible and concentrated to those who are in them, and their costs are spread out and invisible In your opinion, is the 8-hour workday an exclusive benefit for the insiders, or the invisible…
Optionally, because after the 80 are fired, the remaining 20 will think twice before asking for a raise.
I could imagine that someone's plan could be like this: "Our current company has more managers than developers, and the software development is very ineffective because we spend a lot of time in meetings, doing various…
Some companies start with a temporary idea and later pivot to a new one. For example, I know a few companies which at the beginning were just body shops, but the long-term plan was to develop their own projects after…
Heresy! Feynman was the last Prophet of Physics, no one can ever figure out the things he didn't know. If people could discover things after Feynman, those things could get into textbooks, and then mere students could…
Better, call the company that uses PHP most, and tell them than unless they give you $100K a year, you will sunset PHP. (You need to address one specific company, because if you address two, neither will give you a…
Kinda yes, but... it's like all those Nigerian scams. Yes, people outside of Nigeria can do them too, and sometimes they do. And yet. Similarly, PhDs from Africa or China... if you work in a scientific journal, you know…
Consider what happens if you have a community that is very nice, very trusting, and open to everyone including complete strangers who behave weirdly. At the beginning it can be a nice place. Until the first abuser finds…
> Management decides the process, management decides who to hire, management assigns the roles and management decides how urgent the work is. Also, management decides whom to blame. :)
When a small team sits close to each other, you can simply say: "hey guys, anyone got time to check my PR?". In a gigantic org, you can message them on Teams, but everyone keeps getting messages on Teams constantly so…
This sounds like the tragedy of commons. If someone arranges a meeting with you, it is more likely that you will work on their project afterwards, because you have already been thinking about it during the meeting, you…
> removing everything they cannot grasp or simply deem uninteresting again. As an example, there is an American author B.B.Alston whose popular books for children were translated into dozen languages. He has a page on…
This article only talks about some of Wikipedia's problems, but it was the best source I could find quickly: https://www.tracingwoodgrains.com/p/reliable-sources-how-wik...
You were supposed to say that it was always wrong, and that all those "100% AI" blogs about mindfulness are genuine products of humans who suddenly got way more productive recently for reasons completely unrelated to…