Yeah, imagine if it was about some toy operating system.
The audience here already knows what "on-demand provisioning" means.
That's obviously why it was posted.
Neat. Now where's the Glamorous toolkit?
Intended to be like "tree", usually pronounced "try".
Use your OS's package manager.
Are you saying Safari had the right idea? Because I agree.
> Just ensure the invariant function is called at every method You make this sound way easier than I would expect it to be in the general case.
You should literally continue reading the rest of the sentence.
We already know what's happening at his other companies. You're very optimistic if you think this isn't a continuation of that.
https://nitter.fdn.fr/hanno/status/1587776226516557824#m Isn't this a time claim?
Quite a lot of pearl clutching going on in this comment. Here's the quote about the street names: > Second, I am struck by the design of the interface itself: the sci-fi overlay of street names, borders, parcel numbers,…
There's no "T" in "AWK".
Since I just re-watched it: he ran it on a P4 from 2003.
>(well, I don't know if it happened or not) It did. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Dantzig
Perhaps that's intended.
Compiling can certainly still break the flow depending on the language and size of the project. Just ask Google.
Escape the quote. Or just put the path in double quotes.
There's a native icon editor.
>they did not have "a very small performance penalty" Can you clarify what kind of penalty it had then?
"It's just their humour"
> it says to me "people who think the network is Facebook and Google accessed through a web browser" Did you type "Web" in lowercase to make a point? :)
> I’m unaware of any other OS which implements threads this cleanly. I believe this comes from Plan 9.
And when your Linux environment moves to ARM?
This seems like the wrong part of the door to fix.
Yeah, imagine if it was about some toy operating system.
The audience here already knows what "on-demand provisioning" means.
That's obviously why it was posted.
Neat. Now where's the Glamorous toolkit?
Intended to be like "tree", usually pronounced "try".
Use your OS's package manager.
Are you saying Safari had the right idea? Because I agree.
> Just ensure the invariant function is called at every method You make this sound way easier than I would expect it to be in the general case.
You should literally continue reading the rest of the sentence.
We already know what's happening at his other companies. You're very optimistic if you think this isn't a continuation of that.
https://nitter.fdn.fr/hanno/status/1587776226516557824#m Isn't this a time claim?
Quite a lot of pearl clutching going on in this comment. Here's the quote about the street names: > Second, I am struck by the design of the interface itself: the sci-fi overlay of street names, borders, parcel numbers,…
There's no "T" in "AWK".
Since I just re-watched it: he ran it on a P4 from 2003.
>(well, I don't know if it happened or not) It did. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Dantzig
Perhaps that's intended.
Compiling can certainly still break the flow depending on the language and size of the project. Just ask Google.
Escape the quote. Or just put the path in double quotes.
There's a native icon editor.
>they did not have "a very small performance penalty" Can you clarify what kind of penalty it had then?
"It's just their humour"
> it says to me "people who think the network is Facebook and Google accessed through a web browser" Did you type "Web" in lowercase to make a point? :)
> I’m unaware of any other OS which implements threads this cleanly. I believe this comes from Plan 9.
And when your Linux environment moves to ARM?
This seems like the wrong part of the door to fix.