agreed. plus all the languages supported!
climate scientists are fantastic at predicting ecological impact. civilizational/economic impacts cannot be made with the same confidence
Yeah, another example is when the Internation Maritime Organization reduced the legal sulfur content limit in shipping fuel. This reduced SO2 emissions by about 80%, which improved human health, but also caused an…
in large parts of the west! still good news
no. if you work in the industry you'll know power/electricity are used interchangeably, and energy is treated as the superset. in the physics sense, you're right.
it does have a false negative issue
agreed. plus all the languages supported!
climate scientists are fantastic at predicting ecological impact. civilizational/economic impacts cannot be made with the same confidence
Yeah, another example is when the Internation Maritime Organization reduced the legal sulfur content limit in shipping fuel. This reduced SO2 emissions by about 80%, which improved human health, but also caused an…
in large parts of the west! still good news
no. if you work in the industry you'll know power/electricity are used interchangeably, and energy is treated as the superset. in the physics sense, you're right.
it does have a false negative issue