WhiskeyChicken
No user record in our sample, but WhiskeyChicken has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
No user record in our sample, but WhiskeyChicken has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
Subpoenas are never "backed by a warrant." Probably what you mean is a subpoena signed by a judge, rather than the self-issued "administrative" subpoena being discussed here.
If the training data contains sufficient examples of deception being used when doing illegal stuff, wouldn't this be what we'd expect to see, given that it can't actually reason about what "explicitly allowed" really…
Is there a specific reason we should expect that "instructing not to perform" an illegal activity should result in it adhering to said instruction? Is this any different than when it provides wrong output about other…
> trying to prevent misinformation An unsubstantiated and highly arguable claim. > that was actively leading to the spread of a contagious virus Again, so you claim. And, yes, it was "fundamentally flawed" either way…
> That is nonsensical, going slower during a crisis makes zero sense. I never said anything about "going slower," I disagreed with your assertion that "we all agree" that government should be allowed to "overstep…
> Do you think maybe every surgeon in the world, who spends 8+ years studying medicine, just wears masks because they're brainwashed? This is a non sequitur. Surgeons don't wear masks to prevent transmission of airborne…
It's actually supposed to be only symbolic given that it's a joint resolution and not a law.
It's not a law, it's a joint resolution with no power to do anything.
For all those who haven't or won't bother to read it, this is a "joint resolution" - meaning it isn't a proposed law and would have zero effect on anything.
FYI the correct spelling is Swartz, not Schwartz.
> There is value in art done honestly, "bad" or not If I think it's "bad" then it has _zero_ value to _me_. Why does this bother you or anyone else?
> Sorry but it falls into the realm of audiophilia to me Perhaps so. I'm not one of those people that picks up on (or claims to) these subtleties, so I wouldn't know. I wonder if any studies have been done on this.
Imagine thinking there aren't people with exceptional hearing that notice all sorts of things the average person doesn't.
That's what I always thought, too, that the point of referencing Pantone colors is simply that I know what I'll get from the print shop will match the physical swatch I looked at.
For those wondering how this kind of data is obtained: https://www.vice.com/en/article/nepxbz/i-gave-a-bounty-hunte...
This is either cell carrier data or data that is gathered from those "free" apps and games people love to install and grant all permissions to.
Cell carriers sell location data.
I had to resort to logging in via my phone browser the other day. Got endless spinning on desktop, on both Firefox and Chrome. Absolute trash of a website.
The T-Mobile account management website is absolute trash. I was just blowing my stack about this affront to all things decent the other day. Why does showing me my bill and letting me update my account details require…