> Don't programmers know what constitutes acceptable behavior? (Apart from stuff like not showering). Judging by your first paragraph: very much no.
It sounds like you are the problem here to be honest.
The law is a complete joke. That's what things like this tell us.
That's a very Silicon Valley way to look at things. How much does that bandwidth cost on dial-up or 2G?
This is madness. You can't solve every problem with a technological bandage. Spend the time making a nice IRC client.
I don't remember reading that in the DSM. You perpetuate this problem when you trivialize their concerns in this way.
Do you pay taxes?
Where has it been described that the woman was suffering from mental illness? That seems like a retroactive label.
This isn't zero-knowledge. Please use this opportunity to educate the public instead of muddying the term for the sake of marketing buzzwords.
> Don't programmers know what constitutes acceptable behavior? (Apart from stuff like not showering). Judging by your first paragraph: very much no.
It sounds like you are the problem here to be honest.
The law is a complete joke. That's what things like this tell us.
That's a very Silicon Valley way to look at things. How much does that bandwidth cost on dial-up or 2G?
This is madness. You can't solve every problem with a technological bandage. Spend the time making a nice IRC client.
I don't remember reading that in the DSM. You perpetuate this problem when you trivialize their concerns in this way.
Do you pay taxes?
Where has it been described that the woman was suffering from mental illness? That seems like a retroactive label.
This isn't zero-knowledge. Please use this opportunity to educate the public instead of muddying the term for the sake of marketing buzzwords.