It's also known as "commodification", and AI is just the latest and greatest tool to do it.
Why don't we first assume OpenAI can create a cold fusion reactor and then give them a trillion dollars to get it done?
That's not how namespacing works though, is it? Getting UUID 'A' from app 'X' is easily distinguishable from UUID 'A' from app 'Y'.
I don't think they're discounting that distrust can be legitimate, they're questioning whether it's useful to distrust somebody when it's not your job to micromanage them or they're providing adequate output.
Going a step further, I live in a reality where you can train most people against phishing attacks like that. How accurate is the comparison if LLMs can't recover from phishing attacks like that and become more…
Are you not worried that anthropomorphizing them will lead to misinterpreting the failure modes by attributing them to human characteristics, when the failures might not be caused in the same way at all? Why…
> But I would be pretty irritated if the government stepped in and mandated they make my searches public and linkable to me. Who is calling for this? Are you perhaps taking an absolutist view where "not destroying…
I don't understand your logic. Should security reports never be published that say "hash the password before storing it in the DB". Boring research is boring most of the time, that doesn't make it unimportant, no?
Yea, this sounds like "Microsoft teams no longer supporting video on Linux and old versions of mac/windows" more than anything
How is compliance as written impossible?
> I won't use GPL libraries in my code. Why? Do you also avoid libraries with an even number of consonants in the name?
> I create open source software for the benefit of everyone, for profit or not for profit. I have the same reasoning as to why I pick the AGPLv3 license as the default for my new projects. I want any benefits from my…
So the name being wrong means the department should be gutted? Overly-serious naming is hardly a reason to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
What "intended uses" are there for it other than being an unregulated options market with constant scams and a "code is law" tool? I would imagine any other legitimate use would be served better by traditional…
How will this work when people are talking about third party MCP servers(e.x. booking.com, GitHub, etc.)
Don't open source developers and users of their software also benefit from the CVE database? If it were privately funded, what incentive would these private companies have to track bugs for these open source projects…
Yes, as it would be a public good to everyone to be able to know where the potholes(that aren't profitable to fix for these private companies apparently) are so they can avoid them. They might take a step back and…
> So what? You’re basically claiming that it’ll fail because some companies won’t want to provide too much value for free. > If GitHub has an MCP server, you’re still paying them to host your code (potentially) So are…
That's neat, but the bitcoin whitepaper opens with: > Abstract. A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a…
MCP is not self describing by default either. I can implement a tool and not add it to the definitions, much like you can implement an API endpoint and not add it to the spec. This is a documentation/code…
I think you missed the point. To "rank the results by parking availability" you need the results. Currently these are behind paid API keys or frontends with ads. Why would booking.com allow you to download their entire…
This just furthers my theory that people pushing for MCP don't understand how networking and protocols work. stdio is a file that your computer can write to and read from HTTP is a protocol typically used over TCP…
Not only extends them, but compounds them because you have a non-deterministic human making changes to a non-deterministic computer system which is making changes to an existing computer system.
Isn't this DeepMind achievement from 2023?
How does that differ from a non-reasoning model rewarded/punished based on performance at verifiable tasks? What does CoT add that enables the reward/punishment?
It's also known as "commodification", and AI is just the latest and greatest tool to do it.
Why don't we first assume OpenAI can create a cold fusion reactor and then give them a trillion dollars to get it done?
That's not how namespacing works though, is it? Getting UUID 'A' from app 'X' is easily distinguishable from UUID 'A' from app 'Y'.
I don't think they're discounting that distrust can be legitimate, they're questioning whether it's useful to distrust somebody when it's not your job to micromanage them or they're providing adequate output.
Going a step further, I live in a reality where you can train most people against phishing attacks like that. How accurate is the comparison if LLMs can't recover from phishing attacks like that and become more…
Are you not worried that anthropomorphizing them will lead to misinterpreting the failure modes by attributing them to human characteristics, when the failures might not be caused in the same way at all? Why…
> But I would be pretty irritated if the government stepped in and mandated they make my searches public and linkable to me. Who is calling for this? Are you perhaps taking an absolutist view where "not destroying…
I don't understand your logic. Should security reports never be published that say "hash the password before storing it in the DB". Boring research is boring most of the time, that doesn't make it unimportant, no?
Yea, this sounds like "Microsoft teams no longer supporting video on Linux and old versions of mac/windows" more than anything
How is compliance as written impossible?
> I won't use GPL libraries in my code. Why? Do you also avoid libraries with an even number of consonants in the name?
> I create open source software for the benefit of everyone, for profit or not for profit. I have the same reasoning as to why I pick the AGPLv3 license as the default for my new projects. I want any benefits from my…
So the name being wrong means the department should be gutted? Overly-serious naming is hardly a reason to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
What "intended uses" are there for it other than being an unregulated options market with constant scams and a "code is law" tool? I would imagine any other legitimate use would be served better by traditional…
How will this work when people are talking about third party MCP servers(e.x. booking.com, GitHub, etc.)
Don't open source developers and users of their software also benefit from the CVE database? If it were privately funded, what incentive would these private companies have to track bugs for these open source projects…
Yes, as it would be a public good to everyone to be able to know where the potholes(that aren't profitable to fix for these private companies apparently) are so they can avoid them. They might take a step back and…
> So what? You’re basically claiming that it’ll fail because some companies won’t want to provide too much value for free. > If GitHub has an MCP server, you’re still paying them to host your code (potentially) So are…
That's neat, but the bitcoin whitepaper opens with: > Abstract. A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a…
MCP is not self describing by default either. I can implement a tool and not add it to the definitions, much like you can implement an API endpoint and not add it to the spec. This is a documentation/code…
I think you missed the point. To "rank the results by parking availability" you need the results. Currently these are behind paid API keys or frontends with ads. Why would booking.com allow you to download their entire…
This just furthers my theory that people pushing for MCP don't understand how networking and protocols work. stdio is a file that your computer can write to and read from HTTP is a protocol typically used over TCP…
Not only extends them, but compounds them because you have a non-deterministic human making changes to a non-deterministic computer system which is making changes to an existing computer system.
Isn't this DeepMind achievement from 2023?
How does that differ from a non-reasoning model rewarded/punished based on performance at verifiable tasks? What does CoT add that enables the reward/punishment?