I see it frequently used in the context of Podemos or Syriza
So is market harm "Some courts have held this factor to be the most important in the analysis." https://ilt.eff.org/Copyright__Fair_Use.html#Market_Harm
Could people feel dismissive towards your opinion because it sounds like confabulation, rather than a carefully reasoned argument based on data that could spawn a good faith discussion? > What's interesting to me Shower…
the people shooting up gay night clubs?
A quick google search gives us plenty of past published projections and how they fared: https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-how-well-have-climate-m... You can also watch Carl Sagan break it down in front of congress…
Also see this paper on the rise and fall of rationality in language (previously shared on HN) https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2107848118
They do use native widgets: https://toga.readthedocs.io/en/latest/background/philosophy....
I see it frequently used in the context of Podemos or Syriza
So is market harm "Some courts have held this factor to be the most important in the analysis." https://ilt.eff.org/Copyright__Fair_Use.html#Market_Harm
Could people feel dismissive towards your opinion because it sounds like confabulation, rather than a carefully reasoned argument based on data that could spawn a good faith discussion? > What's interesting to me Shower…
the people shooting up gay night clubs?
A quick google search gives us plenty of past published projections and how they fared: https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-how-well-have-climate-m... You can also watch Carl Sagan break it down in front of congress…
Also see this paper on the rise and fall of rationality in language (previously shared on HN) https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2107848118
They do use native widgets: https://toga.readthedocs.io/en/latest/background/philosophy....