Edit: I dropped the points on the details, just to focus on the main point. Rest assured that I read the paper, I was arguing in good faith, and that after a bit more thinking I understand your criticism of my…
The paper's motivation is to explore the new coded display, and they are doing that by exploring an aspect that they care about. That aspect is very specifically well-defined, and if you want to show whether a display…
That is just the motivation, the experiment is much more general and is not related to display technology: > The work presented here attempts to clarify “the rate at which human perception cannot distinguish between…
What they are trying to do is recreating the situation that is more similar to actual light sources in computer screens and TV (varying flickering rate from different pixels/ areas). They are saying that the current…
31 and 32 (by the printed page number), in pdf it’s 42
See my comment on the other reply. > Either there's a study showing that 246 Hz flickering poses "Extremely High" health risks or there isn't. They calculated it using the definition from the standard.
The “very/moderate high” comes from the standard itself, which is quantified within the standard. In the context, it is about the probability of having issues, while the effect (mild to catastrophic) is another axis.…
Edit: I dropped the points on the details, just to focus on the main point. Rest assured that I read the paper, I was arguing in good faith, and that after a bit more thinking I understand your criticism of my…
The paper's motivation is to explore the new coded display, and they are doing that by exploring an aspect that they care about. That aspect is very specifically well-defined, and if you want to show whether a display…
That is just the motivation, the experiment is much more general and is not related to display technology: > The work presented here attempts to clarify “the rate at which human perception cannot distinguish between…
What they are trying to do is recreating the situation that is more similar to actual light sources in computer screens and TV (varying flickering rate from different pixels/ areas). They are saying that the current…
31 and 32 (by the printed page number), in pdf it’s 42
See my comment on the other reply. > Either there's a study showing that 246 Hz flickering poses "Extremely High" health risks or there isn't. They calculated it using the definition from the standard.
The “very/moderate high” comes from the standard itself, which is quantified within the standard. In the context, it is about the probability of having issues, while the effect (mild to catastrophic) is another axis.…