I've never owned a games console so I don't know, but I thought they could be used to play DVD films. It makes perfect sense as part of their function. ISTM anyway.
Fresh cardboard can be a prize bitch too. Even worse perhaps. (source: was picker in a 3M warehouse)
I said this is where it would help (AFAICS), not that it was the best solution.
At a guess, a single thread which benefits from as much cache as it can get.
> with its slow pace and focus on narrative am curious, could you elaborate a touch on these? TIA
> I hit a case where I actually test nothing and have no results. Did I pass? equally, can you reasonably say you failed?
It's a consequence of enforcing logical consistency. You can't get around that (but if you want to suggest other behaviour and justify it, I'd be interested).
That was not an example of low risk, responsible drug use - "There is more stupidity in the universe than hydrogen"
This kind of stupid behaviour does not improve the image of drug use.
Word. I borrowed a circa 2005 – 2010 server and the fan roared on start-up. I would not want that on full-time for reasons of noise, power and wear.
Can't remember but have read you can bootstrap a forth interpreter from an amazingly low number of bytes. Maybe more of theoretical interest than practical but still.
Do those without amnesia do so?
They are fragile I've heard, and quite likely they dull quickly (don't know), but I'm not saying they're 'better' than steel; it's not a competition. Horses/courses.
apparently yes. Broken glass (which obsidian is, a volcanic glass) have edges a few atoms wide beating anything manmade.
Very cute but that's all. No reason for me to consider it true. This if we are making unbacked claims then let me riposte thus, "the past is another country, they do things differently there". Which if true would mean…
You've just made a whole load of claims this without backing any of them up. But okay, let's take one which does make sense: > When people understand the causes and consequences of past events, they are better equipped…
What kind of proof would you want?
> A people cannot understand themselves without understanding their past This kind of stuff gets rolled out regularly by arty and literary types but never with any explanation as to why it might be true, and I don't…
It makes perfect sense in context. You're assuming that the bottom % of engineers drag things down because they're bad. That's not what it's about. Some companies imposed rather brutal policies of "we do an annual…
'qualify' is now standard? Thought it was a vendor extension currently.
evolution
I was saying that shorter code is not necessarily more readable. But what you're talking about is optimisation and I'm fine with that, uglier code for higher speed (or whatever). But is that refactoring? I don't think…
> I'm saying that "pattern" need not be restricted to the narrow sense used in the famous "Gang of Four" book I understood that was exactly what you were saying! Sorry, I'd had a drink.
Testability is a good one, thanks. I'm not so sure about performance and I'll chew that one over for now.
I'm going to disagree and see what other people say. I don't think that reduction of size is of any relevance. I admit my own refractors tend to make things smaller but it's only a tendency. Most definitely some…
I've never owned a games console so I don't know, but I thought they could be used to play DVD films. It makes perfect sense as part of their function. ISTM anyway.
Fresh cardboard can be a prize bitch too. Even worse perhaps. (source: was picker in a 3M warehouse)
I said this is where it would help (AFAICS), not that it was the best solution.
At a guess, a single thread which benefits from as much cache as it can get.
> with its slow pace and focus on narrative am curious, could you elaborate a touch on these? TIA
> I hit a case where I actually test nothing and have no results. Did I pass? equally, can you reasonably say you failed?
It's a consequence of enforcing logical consistency. You can't get around that (but if you want to suggest other behaviour and justify it, I'd be interested).
That was not an example of low risk, responsible drug use - "There is more stupidity in the universe than hydrogen"
This kind of stupid behaviour does not improve the image of drug use.
Word. I borrowed a circa 2005 – 2010 server and the fan roared on start-up. I would not want that on full-time for reasons of noise, power and wear.
Can't remember but have read you can bootstrap a forth interpreter from an amazingly low number of bytes. Maybe more of theoretical interest than practical but still.
Do those without amnesia do so?
They are fragile I've heard, and quite likely they dull quickly (don't know), but I'm not saying they're 'better' than steel; it's not a competition. Horses/courses.
apparently yes. Broken glass (which obsidian is, a volcanic glass) have edges a few atoms wide beating anything manmade.
Very cute but that's all. No reason for me to consider it true. This if we are making unbacked claims then let me riposte thus, "the past is another country, they do things differently there". Which if true would mean…
You've just made a whole load of claims this without backing any of them up. But okay, let's take one which does make sense: > When people understand the causes and consequences of past events, they are better equipped…
What kind of proof would you want?
> A people cannot understand themselves without understanding their past This kind of stuff gets rolled out regularly by arty and literary types but never with any explanation as to why it might be true, and I don't…
It makes perfect sense in context. You're assuming that the bottom % of engineers drag things down because they're bad. That's not what it's about. Some companies imposed rather brutal policies of "we do an annual…
'qualify' is now standard? Thought it was a vendor extension currently.
evolution
I was saying that shorter code is not necessarily more readable. But what you're talking about is optimisation and I'm fine with that, uglier code for higher speed (or whatever). But is that refactoring? I don't think…
> I'm saying that "pattern" need not be restricted to the narrow sense used in the famous "Gang of Four" book I understood that was exactly what you were saying! Sorry, I'd had a drink.
Testability is a good one, thanks. I'm not so sure about performance and I'll chew that one over for now.
I'm going to disagree and see what other people say. I don't think that reduction of size is of any relevance. I admit my own refractors tend to make things smaller but it's only a tendency. Most definitely some…