> I don't think it's fair of you to use quotation marks when the person you are responding to didn't use that language. Which everyone who reads it can clearly see, and understand that I saw that kind of language as a…
You don't seem to have much interest in answering the crux of my point, which is the continual asking of why until you get to the true reasons why things are the case. Instead, you've just given another high level…
I started writing out a much longer response to this, but it just got very ranty so I'll cut it short. If you insist on such a reevaluation as to why people aren't in their best state, a one word answer "lazy",…
> I don't think it's fair of you to use quotation marks when the person you are responding to didn't use that language. Which everyone who reads it can clearly see, and understand that I saw that kind of language as a…
You don't seem to have much interest in answering the crux of my point, which is the continual asking of why until you get to the true reasons why things are the case. Instead, you've just given another high level…
I started writing out a much longer response to this, but it just got very ranty so I'll cut it short. If you insist on such a reevaluation as to why people aren't in their best state, a one word answer "lazy",…