Nobody is reviewing this, right?
Nobody said you should? Some people merely enjoy programming more than engineering.
Most dont :)
I wasn't expecting the answer to be "because copy-pasting would involve too much thinking". Some people are borderline afraid to touch their keyboards these days.
Is your buddy incapable of speaking on his own behalf? Im sure he's aware of the reputational damage he's caused your company by now...
I've witnessed SQL executed with a where clause be wrapped in a function which then iterates over the result to re-enforce the where clause. People need to read the slop they're throwing at reviewers.
Magnetic domain
Personally I've seen way more duplication as a result of AI in large codebases
This is more about a hard dependency which causes a function to early exit
I'm absolutely right.
Just don't vibe code?
> "Claude clearly made things worse" &emdash; the main claim Even this report is full of claude-introduced bugs
No, you'll need to be on call to fix all the slop falling apart
Then why did you open the pr...?
Sounds fair to me so long as students were aware going into the test that syntax would be graded
So many of the code comments on the new port concern only discussion on how it was ported, usually referring reader to the original zig implementation. So now I'd basically be reading 2x the amount of comments and code…
Step 1: remove reference to blockchain Step 2: insert reference to AI
At this point if I see "Made with {whatever_service_you_outsourced_thinking_to}" on a PR description and you didn't even feel like putting the effort to remove it, I'm going in with the assumption that you didn't bother…
You don't get attribution for your work if it merely feeds into it's training data
AI boom or bubble: https://opper.ai/ai-roundtable/questions/3c481063-032 Was interesting to see opus taking the other models' disagreement as evidence to it's argument
One thing I'll give sora is that the remix feature actually required human input and enabled users to interact with each other through a novel means.
I mean... it's satire but a giant agent honeypot in and of itself would be useful. Creators of PRs for such a project could then be blacklisted elsewhere.
Green username just means new user (under 1 month iirc)
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada Remote: Yes (but also in-person or hybrid) Willing to relocate: Yes Technologies: C, C++, C#, Python, SQL, R, Redis, ZeroMQ, MQTT, Protobuf, gRPC, PyTorch, and Tensorflow. Résumé/CV:…
Nobody is reviewing this, right?
Nobody said you should? Some people merely enjoy programming more than engineering.
Most dont :)
I wasn't expecting the answer to be "because copy-pasting would involve too much thinking". Some people are borderline afraid to touch their keyboards these days.
Is your buddy incapable of speaking on his own behalf? Im sure he's aware of the reputational damage he's caused your company by now...
I've witnessed SQL executed with a where clause be wrapped in a function which then iterates over the result to re-enforce the where clause. People need to read the slop they're throwing at reviewers.
Magnetic domain
Personally I've seen way more duplication as a result of AI in large codebases
This is more about a hard dependency which causes a function to early exit
I'm absolutely right.
Just don't vibe code?
> "Claude clearly made things worse" &emdash; the main claim Even this report is full of claude-introduced bugs
No, you'll need to be on call to fix all the slop falling apart
Then why did you open the pr...?
Sounds fair to me so long as students were aware going into the test that syntax would be graded
So many of the code comments on the new port concern only discussion on how it was ported, usually referring reader to the original zig implementation. So now I'd basically be reading 2x the amount of comments and code…
Step 1: remove reference to blockchain Step 2: insert reference to AI
At this point if I see "Made with {whatever_service_you_outsourced_thinking_to}" on a PR description and you didn't even feel like putting the effort to remove it, I'm going in with the assumption that you didn't bother…
You don't get attribution for your work if it merely feeds into it's training data
AI boom or bubble: https://opper.ai/ai-roundtable/questions/3c481063-032 Was interesting to see opus taking the other models' disagreement as evidence to it's argument
One thing I'll give sora is that the remix feature actually required human input and enabled users to interact with each other through a novel means.
I mean... it's satire but a giant agent honeypot in and of itself would be useful. Creators of PRs for such a project could then be blacklisted elsewhere.
Green username just means new user (under 1 month iirc)
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada Remote: Yes (but also in-person or hybrid) Willing to relocate: Yes Technologies: C, C++, C#, Python, SQL, R, Redis, ZeroMQ, MQTT, Protobuf, gRPC, PyTorch, and Tensorflow. Résumé/CV:…