Yeah but that goes against their "press a button for a taxi" philosophy.
What do the lines mean?
Even if it starts stagnating it will pass the US in total GDP. China has 10x the population of Japan. Not that it matters. The average Chinese will still be a lot poorer than the average American.
Maybe they meant $42.5 million in profit?
you'll still need electricity for your laptop, microwave, fridge etc.
> considering that land (and property) is more or less in fixed supply, SF could justifiably implement price/rent controls. > Supply can be increased pretty easily First you say supply can't be increased. Then you say…
Plus I'm pretty sure that would be clearly unconstitutional.
Many countries don't have net-neutrality laws (I grew up in one of them) and the internet still works just fine. I don't know if net-neutrality is good or bad for smaller reasons like bandwidth and prices but I know for…
Yeah but that goes against their "press a button for a taxi" philosophy.
What do the lines mean?
Even if it starts stagnating it will pass the US in total GDP. China has 10x the population of Japan. Not that it matters. The average Chinese will still be a lot poorer than the average American.
Maybe they meant $42.5 million in profit?
you'll still need electricity for your laptop, microwave, fridge etc.
> considering that land (and property) is more or less in fixed supply, SF could justifiably implement price/rent controls. > Supply can be increased pretty easily First you say supply can't be increased. Then you say…
Plus I'm pretty sure that would be clearly unconstitutional.
Many countries don't have net-neutrality laws (I grew up in one of them) and the internet still works just fine. I don't know if net-neutrality is good or bad for smaller reasons like bandwidth and prices but I know for…