> My understanding is that there's somewhat of a gray area for requests that do not accurately enough specify the information desired. The agency in question can basically say "We don't understand what you're…
> The commerce clause just says that the federal government has the authority to regulate interstate commerce. This is not completely correct. Let me expand a little bit even though it is not applicable here. There is…
Yes, that statute requires a warrant. However, the exclusionary rule is only applicable to one with a "reasonable expectation of privacy." In the hypothetical, C does not have such an expectation, and therefore C cannot…
That is correct, but the warrant requirement does not follow common sense. Let me try to explain further with an example. A sends a letter to B with information in the letter that implicates C in a crime. The FBI does…
This is something that a significant amount of people do not understand. The fiduciary duty in this situation runs to the company not to individual employees.
The same thing happened to me.
>stealing from your fellow citizens who are paying their taxes. You are confusing who is stealing from whom.
That is not a fair comparison. California's gas tax (including excise tax) is higher than Oregon. In addition, California requires a more expensive blend of gasoline. A better comparison would be to a state that has…
From Tesla's 10-k, "While our plan is to attempt to produce lithium-ion cells and finished battery packs for our Gen III vehicles at a new Tesla Gigafactory, our plans for such production are at a very early stage. We…
> My understanding is that there's somewhat of a gray area for requests that do not accurately enough specify the information desired. The agency in question can basically say "We don't understand what you're…
> The commerce clause just says that the federal government has the authority to regulate interstate commerce. This is not completely correct. Let me expand a little bit even though it is not applicable here. There is…
Yes, that statute requires a warrant. However, the exclusionary rule is only applicable to one with a "reasonable expectation of privacy." In the hypothetical, C does not have such an expectation, and therefore C cannot…
That is correct, but the warrant requirement does not follow common sense. Let me try to explain further with an example. A sends a letter to B with information in the letter that implicates C in a crime. The FBI does…
This is something that a significant amount of people do not understand. The fiduciary duty in this situation runs to the company not to individual employees.
The same thing happened to me.
>stealing from your fellow citizens who are paying their taxes. You are confusing who is stealing from whom.
That is not a fair comparison. California's gas tax (including excise tax) is higher than Oregon. In addition, California requires a more expensive blend of gasoline. A better comparison would be to a state that has…
From Tesla's 10-k, "While our plan is to attempt to produce lithium-ion cells and finished battery packs for our Gen III vehicles at a new Tesla Gigafactory, our plans for such production are at a very early stage. We…