> "Ultimately, it may even turn out that I won’t be able to get a visa to China because of you. This is definitely going too far, and I would have to end our advisory relationship" At this point, you're misrepresenting…
The fact that the advisor in the OP changed their stories multiple times indicates duplicity. Your inability to see that, coupled with an abrupt allegation against the journalist suggests self-deception
Agreed, it's classic concern-trolling.
You should disclaim that you're on the core team of Marko.
> "Ultimately, it may even turn out that I won’t be able to get a visa to China because of you. This is definitely going too far, and I would have to end our advisory relationship" At this point, you're misrepresenting…
The fact that the advisor in the OP changed their stories multiple times indicates duplicity. Your inability to see that, coupled with an abrupt allegation against the journalist suggests self-deception
Agreed, it's classic concern-trolling.
You should disclaim that you're on the core team of Marko.