You can't really compare aws to linode. Aws have hundreds of Gb of transit bandwidth so they can easily absorbe big attacks. They also have a backbone network which allows the to increase the surface area of attacks…
You can't really compare aws to linode. Aws have hundreds of Gb of transit bandwidth so they can easily absorbe big attacks. They also have a backbone network which allows them to increase the surface area of attacks…
It wouldn't be 10-20g. That should be easy to handle for most hosting providers. Attacks these days are commonly over 100g. That becomes challenging
You can't really compare aws to linode. Aws have hundreds of Gb of transit bandwidth so they can easily absorbe big attacks. They also have a backbone network which allows the to increase the surface area of attacks…
You can't really compare aws to linode. Aws have hundreds of Gb of transit bandwidth so they can easily absorbe big attacks. They also have a backbone network which allows them to increase the surface area of attacks…
It wouldn't be 10-20g. That should be easy to handle for most hosting providers. Attacks these days are commonly over 100g. That becomes challenging