Almost every point follows the same structure: > "Here is a real concern about implementation" → "Therefore you should refuse entirely" This skips the middle step of "therefore we should implement it well." I'm not…
[dead]
Out of curiosity, what's the prioritization of evidence (RTC Metanalysis > RTC > observational ) etc, and what's the end user benefit over a tool like OpenEvidence? You mention that other tools are expensive, slow, or…
Almost every point follows the same structure: > "Here is a real concern about implementation" → "Therefore you should refuse entirely" This skips the middle step of "therefore we should implement it well." I'm not…
[dead]
Out of curiosity, what's the prioritization of evidence (RTC Metanalysis > RTC > observational ) etc, and what's the end user benefit over a tool like OpenEvidence? You mention that other tools are expensive, slow, or…