Uh... Seems like rage is maybe a tad misplaced?
No, you're missing his. Technology progresses. You're playing to an end-state of AI that assumes labor disappears entirely because you have yet to see what the new labor system looks like.
The notion that the average developer would recover from the removal of modern high level language abstractions and frameworks, learn assembly, and go back to their regular coding velocity is patently absurd.
Thanks for calling it out. Noted!
> All the devs would spend a couple weeks learning assembly and go on coding A couple weeks?! Really slacking, why not a few hours? Add the violin and calculus while they're at it.
Perhaps, that still frames harassing and antagonizing "Aaron Schwartz" as a bad thing (he was a "good guy"), and then implying that said bad thing should happen to AI because it is bad, when the modern AI frontier lab…
> But the master had already overwritten it with a copy of DOOM. A master after my own heart.
On every objective measure, quality is improving and the trendline is clear. I'm by no means citing that AI is perfect, or that there are no problems or challenges ahead, but the self-lobotomizing AI doomerism/rejection…
"Generate me an explainer video of someone holding a sign stating "I have no idea what I'm talking about" being educated about the realities of time, labor, and 'good enough'" You're right. I didn't even need AI to get…
Your “simple defense” is one that misunderstands the economic value of creative work. I know an artist who has done well for themselves. They have done so because they have revealed that they know what it is they sell.…
This is a really narrow, myopic view of it all.
No, it’s been decided by the courts to be fair use. I’m not sure why people think they understand IP law better than the courts just because they don’t like the answer
Depending on the context, it’s fair use. As it is, in this case.
> Can I make my own competitive LLM? Yes, yes you can. See the number of startups that have finetuned or trained an OSS model to build their business on. “But you have to have compute!” Ok, and you’re writing OSS on a…
forecasting = modeling = intelligence, you mean?
You're going to probably be downvoted because the truth is hard and the collective human ego is self-reinforcing, but I think you are correct. 'Quality' is a function of filling in the gaps of the new tools, not…
You are. Most people have just long decided to forgo nuance for the simplicity of snark and hate as a default response
Not quite. If the materials were publicly available on a site and scraped? Fair use. If they were distributed illegally and acquired through that distribution? Cooked. If you scraped it AND saved it? Cooked.
Or, it's dumb as hell to have an AI re-write Word every time it wants to output or present a document. But let's focus on how this validates the belief that "AI bad."
Doesn't Tether lack end-to-end encryption, making it less secure for private communications?
This is only because this is a legal right granted as part of the purchase of copyrighted material, and because we have tried to stop AI companies from doing this with purely digital copies. The insanity of attempting…
Very clearly established. AI only = no copyright. “A Single Piece of American Cheese” got a copyright because it had human involvement in compositing. Theatre D’Opera did not because it was primarily prompt driven.…
Because AI is only impressive if the average Taco Bell employee can guide it to address niche domain topics? It seems obvious to me that you’d need someone to point at a thing and say “pay attention to that”, as a…
Raising only because others cited concerns this might cause issues in personal harness contexts. It doesn't. Obviously, I wasn't claiming that it would WORK for cross-model subagents, but that this would be a limiting…
In my tests, as of this morning on the latest Codex SDK, this is not happening for sub-agent requests made in my own harness to other model providers treated as sub-agents. Specifically, I use Opus and others for…
Uh... Seems like rage is maybe a tad misplaced?
No, you're missing his. Technology progresses. You're playing to an end-state of AI that assumes labor disappears entirely because you have yet to see what the new labor system looks like.
The notion that the average developer would recover from the removal of modern high level language abstractions and frameworks, learn assembly, and go back to their regular coding velocity is patently absurd.
Thanks for calling it out. Noted!
> All the devs would spend a couple weeks learning assembly and go on coding A couple weeks?! Really slacking, why not a few hours? Add the violin and calculus while they're at it.
Perhaps, that still frames harassing and antagonizing "Aaron Schwartz" as a bad thing (he was a "good guy"), and then implying that said bad thing should happen to AI because it is bad, when the modern AI frontier lab…
> But the master had already overwritten it with a copy of DOOM. A master after my own heart.
On every objective measure, quality is improving and the trendline is clear. I'm by no means citing that AI is perfect, or that there are no problems or challenges ahead, but the self-lobotomizing AI doomerism/rejection…
"Generate me an explainer video of someone holding a sign stating "I have no idea what I'm talking about" being educated about the realities of time, labor, and 'good enough'" You're right. I didn't even need AI to get…
Your “simple defense” is one that misunderstands the economic value of creative work. I know an artist who has done well for themselves. They have done so because they have revealed that they know what it is they sell.…
This is a really narrow, myopic view of it all.
No, it’s been decided by the courts to be fair use. I’m not sure why people think they understand IP law better than the courts just because they don’t like the answer
Depending on the context, it’s fair use. As it is, in this case.
> Can I make my own competitive LLM? Yes, yes you can. See the number of startups that have finetuned or trained an OSS model to build their business on. “But you have to have compute!” Ok, and you’re writing OSS on a…
forecasting = modeling = intelligence, you mean?
You're going to probably be downvoted because the truth is hard and the collective human ego is self-reinforcing, but I think you are correct. 'Quality' is a function of filling in the gaps of the new tools, not…
You are. Most people have just long decided to forgo nuance for the simplicity of snark and hate as a default response
Not quite. If the materials were publicly available on a site and scraped? Fair use. If they were distributed illegally and acquired through that distribution? Cooked. If you scraped it AND saved it? Cooked.
Or, it's dumb as hell to have an AI re-write Word every time it wants to output or present a document. But let's focus on how this validates the belief that "AI bad."
Doesn't Tether lack end-to-end encryption, making it less secure for private communications?
This is only because this is a legal right granted as part of the purchase of copyrighted material, and because we have tried to stop AI companies from doing this with purely digital copies. The insanity of attempting…
Very clearly established. AI only = no copyright. “A Single Piece of American Cheese” got a copyright because it had human involvement in compositing. Theatre D’Opera did not because it was primarily prompt driven.…
Because AI is only impressive if the average Taco Bell employee can guide it to address niche domain topics? It seems obvious to me that you’d need someone to point at a thing and say “pay attention to that”, as a…
Raising only because others cited concerns this might cause issues in personal harness contexts. It doesn't. Obviously, I wasn't claiming that it would WORK for cross-model subagents, but that this would be a limiting…
In my tests, as of this morning on the latest Codex SDK, this is not happening for sub-agent requests made in my own harness to other model providers treated as sub-agents. Specifically, I use Opus and others for…