>it is a matter of those people propagating an ideology based on the subjugation and extermination of minorities, and calling for violence and direct action against said minorities. Could you provide a quote from…
Again, if you want to alter behavior you need to be clear about what the behavior you oppose is. This is my understanding of a flamewar: https://www.webopedia.com/TERM/F/flame_war.html I have not engaged in anything…
>that the presence of hate-spewing and minority-oppressing fascists is not wanted. But the bulk of the people being targeted are none of those things. What the average person is seeing is that anyone who dares to state…
>I don't see how the internet has made Spencer any more relevant than the Nazis Geraldo used to have on his show in the 80s. Talk shows are a controlled medium. The "nazis" that appeared on them were usually actors…
>We must not tolerate intolerance, because that kills tolerance overall. I see people repeat that, but I don't see anything to indicate it is true. Quite the contrary, it would appear that one of the main factors in the…
The myth is that 90% were involved in food production in any way. Butchers and millers and brewers and bakers are part of that 90%, they were not doing anything in any fields. But that myth is based on England under…
>I mean Hitler's economy was a conquest dependent mess No it wasn't. The economic recovery occurred way before the war did.
>If this were important, surely some scientist would have found holes in the theories no? Yes, and they have. But you ignore them and slander them and then say "see, nobody has found any holes!".
The actual left contains people openly advocating violence against "nazis", while calling anyone who disagrees with them a nazi. The actual left is openly engaged in mass censorship of people who express views they…
I love how in modern discourse, nazi apologists predate nazis.
No they didn't. We have books on farming that are 2000 years old, people have read them even. Just because movies show dirty peasants hoeing fields doesn't mean that was reality.
>The evidence of harm is far from conclusive, and given the replication crisis, your stating these claims as facts is completely unjustified. Then say "I don't believe that" instead of trying to engage in silly…
>Many things didn't exist before the 1900s, that still doesn't entail they are harmful. Stop trying to reverse my statement because you think that will allow you to dismiss it. I said they are harmful, and they did not…
I have not made any extraordinary claims, I have repeated the very standard scientific consensus, which is constantly repeated in the popular media. I do not presume that every piece of common knowledge is going to be…
>The former isn’t true for income Wealth inequality is not about income is it? >doesn’t remain true for wealth for more than a couple generations So, it only remains true for as long as it has existed? >The latter is of…
>But they don’t have modern medicine Yes, we've covered that haven't we? In the very post you just replied to, in order to add absolutely nothing to the discussion? >Indigenous tribes who have contact with society are…
>Nobody lives in the Stone Age today. That’s a period of time. Yes they do. It is a period of technological development. There is no singular timespan that makes up the stone age or bronze age or iron age, those periods…
I don't follow. How did that get us "into this mess"? Maybe I am confused about what exactly you consider to be "this mess".
>Citation please. https://www.google.com/search?q=co2%20plant%20nutrition >Naturalistic fallacy. "Industrial waste" isn't necessarily harmful. It is not a naturalistic fallacy. The things I mentioned are harmful.…
>"A nation is a people" does not say anything Yes it does. A nation is not a government, nor a territory. It is a group of people who share common ancestry and culture. >It's a totally empty phrase given that the notion…
I am not dismissing medicine. But the existence of medicine now does not mean life centuries ago was a horrifying existence struggling to survive as popular culture suggests. There are still primitive people now, whose…
>Even if we have less nutritious food, which is debatable It really isn't, it has been measured. With increased atmospheric CO2, plants grow faster and end up with a much higher calorie:micronutrient ratio. We also…
>the idea of people mostly staying put over that time frame is demolished. That idea was never put forward. Again, a nation is a people. >It's about fear, where origin is a proxy. It seems rather arrogant to tell other…
>I'm not convinced that people intrinsically "care" about migration Lots of people do. For many people it genuinely is about maintaining the nations their ancestors spent hundreds of generations creating. Nations, not…
>Since modern states don't have an entrenched hereditary aristocracy We absolutely do, but because we are bombarded with propaganda telling us they "earned it" by "working hard" and "pulling themselves up by their…
>it is a matter of those people propagating an ideology based on the subjugation and extermination of minorities, and calling for violence and direct action against said minorities. Could you provide a quote from…
Again, if you want to alter behavior you need to be clear about what the behavior you oppose is. This is my understanding of a flamewar: https://www.webopedia.com/TERM/F/flame_war.html I have not engaged in anything…
>that the presence of hate-spewing and minority-oppressing fascists is not wanted. But the bulk of the people being targeted are none of those things. What the average person is seeing is that anyone who dares to state…
>I don't see how the internet has made Spencer any more relevant than the Nazis Geraldo used to have on his show in the 80s. Talk shows are a controlled medium. The "nazis" that appeared on them were usually actors…
>We must not tolerate intolerance, because that kills tolerance overall. I see people repeat that, but I don't see anything to indicate it is true. Quite the contrary, it would appear that one of the main factors in the…
The myth is that 90% were involved in food production in any way. Butchers and millers and brewers and bakers are part of that 90%, they were not doing anything in any fields. But that myth is based on England under…
>I mean Hitler's economy was a conquest dependent mess No it wasn't. The economic recovery occurred way before the war did.
>If this were important, surely some scientist would have found holes in the theories no? Yes, and they have. But you ignore them and slander them and then say "see, nobody has found any holes!".
The actual left contains people openly advocating violence against "nazis", while calling anyone who disagrees with them a nazi. The actual left is openly engaged in mass censorship of people who express views they…
I love how in modern discourse, nazi apologists predate nazis.
No they didn't. We have books on farming that are 2000 years old, people have read them even. Just because movies show dirty peasants hoeing fields doesn't mean that was reality.
>The evidence of harm is far from conclusive, and given the replication crisis, your stating these claims as facts is completely unjustified. Then say "I don't believe that" instead of trying to engage in silly…
>Many things didn't exist before the 1900s, that still doesn't entail they are harmful. Stop trying to reverse my statement because you think that will allow you to dismiss it. I said they are harmful, and they did not…
I have not made any extraordinary claims, I have repeated the very standard scientific consensus, which is constantly repeated in the popular media. I do not presume that every piece of common knowledge is going to be…
>The former isn’t true for income Wealth inequality is not about income is it? >doesn’t remain true for wealth for more than a couple generations So, it only remains true for as long as it has existed? >The latter is of…
>But they don’t have modern medicine Yes, we've covered that haven't we? In the very post you just replied to, in order to add absolutely nothing to the discussion? >Indigenous tribes who have contact with society are…
>Nobody lives in the Stone Age today. That’s a period of time. Yes they do. It is a period of technological development. There is no singular timespan that makes up the stone age or bronze age or iron age, those periods…
I don't follow. How did that get us "into this mess"? Maybe I am confused about what exactly you consider to be "this mess".
>Citation please. https://www.google.com/search?q=co2%20plant%20nutrition >Naturalistic fallacy. "Industrial waste" isn't necessarily harmful. It is not a naturalistic fallacy. The things I mentioned are harmful.…
>"A nation is a people" does not say anything Yes it does. A nation is not a government, nor a territory. It is a group of people who share common ancestry and culture. >It's a totally empty phrase given that the notion…
I am not dismissing medicine. But the existence of medicine now does not mean life centuries ago was a horrifying existence struggling to survive as popular culture suggests. There are still primitive people now, whose…
>Even if we have less nutritious food, which is debatable It really isn't, it has been measured. With increased atmospheric CO2, plants grow faster and end up with a much higher calorie:micronutrient ratio. We also…
>the idea of people mostly staying put over that time frame is demolished. That idea was never put forward. Again, a nation is a people. >It's about fear, where origin is a proxy. It seems rather arrogant to tell other…
>I'm not convinced that people intrinsically "care" about migration Lots of people do. For many people it genuinely is about maintaining the nations their ancestors spent hundreds of generations creating. Nations, not…
>Since modern states don't have an entrenched hereditary aristocracy We absolutely do, but because we are bombarded with propaganda telling us they "earned it" by "working hard" and "pulling themselves up by their…