[dead]
That's not a rebuttal dummy. Do you want the legitimacy debate confers your position? Then debate. None of my points are any one else's talking points. That's a sign of a non-dogmatic thinker, dummy.
It's sad to see how easily westerners are mislead by our own leaders, who ape Soviet contempt for constituents and maliciously ignore voter inputs. You should at least make an effort to see things from the Russian point…
The centralization has to do with cheap money. That appears to be a topic beyond your pay grade. Hacker News has a low skill base when it comes to economic understanding. VC funded enterprises all have a magic money…
We're talking about advertising, not monopolies. That's your first fail. Second, you present a false binary that we have either the duopoly, or the self-starting individual. Marketing is a subset of Influence. Influence…
You add more premises without first evaluating or addressing my point. You imitate the tone of rationality, but you cannot even follow the simple rules of debate. You need 2 premises to rebut my 1. In logic, we call…
Advertising is a judgement. It is a synthetic definition (defined but it's relationship to other concepts), but you want it to be analytic (ex: the number 5). You completely dodge my point because it's a stake in the…
Law doesn't trump language when it comes to the truth. Nazis had laws too
How is that definition of advertising different from language and symbol? Would an Icelandic saga be considered an advertisement for murder? You really have not thought this through.
Hey downvoter. If the point is so weak, surely you can refute my moronic self with some cunning argument. Why are so many information scientists afraid of information?
Define advertising by segmenting off of Poetry, Prose, and Aphorism. You can't. I don't understand how so many engineers can't do basic logic.
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
That's not a rebuttal dummy. Do you want the legitimacy debate confers your position? Then debate. None of my points are any one else's talking points. That's a sign of a non-dogmatic thinker, dummy.
It's sad to see how easily westerners are mislead by our own leaders, who ape Soviet contempt for constituents and maliciously ignore voter inputs. You should at least make an effort to see things from the Russian point…
The centralization has to do with cheap money. That appears to be a topic beyond your pay grade. Hacker News has a low skill base when it comes to economic understanding. VC funded enterprises all have a magic money…
We're talking about advertising, not monopolies. That's your first fail. Second, you present a false binary that we have either the duopoly, or the self-starting individual. Marketing is a subset of Influence. Influence…
You add more premises without first evaluating or addressing my point. You imitate the tone of rationality, but you cannot even follow the simple rules of debate. You need 2 premises to rebut my 1. In logic, we call…
Advertising is a judgement. It is a synthetic definition (defined but it's relationship to other concepts), but you want it to be analytic (ex: the number 5). You completely dodge my point because it's a stake in the…
Law doesn't trump language when it comes to the truth. Nazis had laws too
How is that definition of advertising different from language and symbol? Would an Icelandic saga be considered an advertisement for murder? You really have not thought this through.
Hey downvoter. If the point is so weak, surely you can refute my moronic self with some cunning argument. Why are so many information scientists afraid of information?
Define advertising by segmenting off of Poetry, Prose, and Aphorism. You can't. I don't understand how so many engineers can't do basic logic.