[dead]
That's not a rebuttal dummy. Do you want the legitimacy debate confers your position? Then debate. None of my points are any one else's talking points. That's a sign of a non-dogmatic thinker, dummy.
It's sad to see how easily westerners are mislead by our own leaders, who ape Soviet contempt for constituents and maliciously ignore voter inputs. You should at least make an effort to see things from the Russian point…
You add more premises without first evaluating or addressing my point. You imitate the tone of rationality, but you cannot even follow the simple rules of debate. You need 2 premises to rebut my 1. In logic, we call…
Advertising is a judgement. It is a synthetic definition (defined but it's relationship to other concepts), but you want it to be analytic (ex: the number 5). You completely dodge my point because it's a stake in the…
How is that definition of advertising different from language and symbol? Would an Icelandic saga be considered an advertisement for murder? You really have not thought this through.
Hey downvoter. If the point is so weak, surely you can refute my moronic self with some cunning argument. Why are so many information scientists afraid of information?
Define advertising by segmenting off of Poetry, Prose, and Aphorism. You can't. I don't understand how so many engineers can't do basic logic.
It's too subtle a point. The argument here is not about logic, but about intellectual honesty. The parent you replied to believes everybody else is unduly influenced by 'asshats' and that his/her favored influencers are…
Seems obvious. I agree. However I think you're not going to get through to those with central planning biases. By which I mean, the notion that perfect planning can beat the market. The Palace Economy central planner…
And this is why the West has failed. Because even in the most educated forum online, you prefer malicious decorum over crude logic.
You have identified the key issue: what does "safety" mean? Can it be misused? Yes. So we know it means _something_. Does it have a meaningful opposite? 'Danger?' Means imminent threat. Does 'safety' mean 'no imminent…
Ah, the failure is yours, but the downvote is mine. And you wanted to converse in a philosophy thread? It's almost as if you are proving why programmers are on average poor thinkers. Too used to the computer and herd…
Truth hurts, huh? Downvote without rebuttal means you admit I'm right & it makes you angry. Thanks.
You demonstrate that English is not an STD. Academia vs Discipline. One is institution one is practice. I understand it's the weekend but lay off the beer.
Safety is a trash concept and I don't even need to be Wittgenstein to prove it. What is absolute safety? You must answer with a synthetic concept. That's pure fail. It becomes a judgment, not a definition. But you want…
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
That's not a rebuttal dummy. Do you want the legitimacy debate confers your position? Then debate. None of my points are any one else's talking points. That's a sign of a non-dogmatic thinker, dummy.
It's sad to see how easily westerners are mislead by our own leaders, who ape Soviet contempt for constituents and maliciously ignore voter inputs. You should at least make an effort to see things from the Russian point…
You add more premises without first evaluating or addressing my point. You imitate the tone of rationality, but you cannot even follow the simple rules of debate. You need 2 premises to rebut my 1. In logic, we call…
Advertising is a judgement. It is a synthetic definition (defined but it's relationship to other concepts), but you want it to be analytic (ex: the number 5). You completely dodge my point because it's a stake in the…
How is that definition of advertising different from language and symbol? Would an Icelandic saga be considered an advertisement for murder? You really have not thought this through.
Hey downvoter. If the point is so weak, surely you can refute my moronic self with some cunning argument. Why are so many information scientists afraid of information?
Define advertising by segmenting off of Poetry, Prose, and Aphorism. You can't. I don't understand how so many engineers can't do basic logic.
It's too subtle a point. The argument here is not about logic, but about intellectual honesty. The parent you replied to believes everybody else is unduly influenced by 'asshats' and that his/her favored influencers are…
Seems obvious. I agree. However I think you're not going to get through to those with central planning biases. By which I mean, the notion that perfect planning can beat the market. The Palace Economy central planner…
And this is why the West has failed. Because even in the most educated forum online, you prefer malicious decorum over crude logic.
You have identified the key issue: what does "safety" mean? Can it be misused? Yes. So we know it means _something_. Does it have a meaningful opposite? 'Danger?' Means imminent threat. Does 'safety' mean 'no imminent…
Ah, the failure is yours, but the downvote is mine. And you wanted to converse in a philosophy thread? It's almost as if you are proving why programmers are on average poor thinkers. Too used to the computer and herd…
Truth hurts, huh? Downvote without rebuttal means you admit I'm right & it makes you angry. Thanks.
You demonstrate that English is not an STD. Academia vs Discipline. One is institution one is practice. I understand it's the weekend but lay off the beer.
Safety is a trash concept and I don't even need to be Wittgenstein to prove it. What is absolute safety? You must answer with a synthetic concept. That's pure fail. It becomes a judgment, not a definition. But you want…