Kinds interesting. Couldn't these also just be defined as not-yet-definrd words? Free real estate.
There is a massive amount of conservative estimates implemented in current EPA standards. Further, air emission standards are typically based off "potential to emit" to add. A ~8% difference in efficiency is large, but…
Meanwhile, the article touches on "if it's good enough for one regulator, it's good for the next." That's quite a difference between two first-world regulatory agencies.
no contact or thanks for potentially avoiding a lawsuit for them.
I'd be kicking myself if I did not go out of my way to thank you for your service.
This is linking to an alzheimers drug and not related to your headline. I think there has been a mistake.
If anyone is interested, Walter Isaacson has a great book called "Innovators: that touches on this and many relayed and interesting stories.
Kinds interesting. Couldn't these also just be defined as not-yet-definrd words? Free real estate.
There is a massive amount of conservative estimates implemented in current EPA standards. Further, air emission standards are typically based off "potential to emit" to add. A ~8% difference in efficiency is large, but…
Meanwhile, the article touches on "if it's good enough for one regulator, it's good for the next." That's quite a difference between two first-world regulatory agencies.
no contact or thanks for potentially avoiding a lawsuit for them.
I'd be kicking myself if I did not go out of my way to thank you for your service.
This is linking to an alzheimers drug and not related to your headline. I think there has been a mistake.
If anyone is interested, Walter Isaacson has a great book called "Innovators: that touches on this and many relayed and interesting stories.