> Giving up a little privacy to stop thousands of murders of innocents is a trade-off im willing to make. That's disgusting.
I wonder how soon someone will leave a comment here saying something like, “Aaactually, this isn’t censorship.”
> I vehemently opposed it at the time, on principle, and got downvoted to heck for it. Thank you.
The Hacker News community didn’t see any problem at all in 2022 when NameCheap massively revoked the registrations of everyone with Russian passports. Everyone fervently supported this initiative, I remember it clearly.…
Don't you say. You don't even know what was that horrible treatment exactly - didn't even ask, why would you, right? - but you've promptly explained to the guy that it was his fucking fault - he's from the sanctioned…
There’s always someone willing to explain how sanctions work to those who are subject to them. Thank you for your work, sir. What would we do without you.
Sad. I actually have a storage box from Hetzner, let me open a test ticket to see how fast they react.
Have you ever contacted their support? I'm thinking about switching to Hetzner.
And why exactly is that the case? Why should I prioritize morality and empathy over my own well-being?
And that changes things how exactly? The problem is that American companies have been stealing our data for decades, not their ties to the government.
Such is the reality as we perceive it through our senses. Everyone has to put up with certain corrupt practices in order to preserve their sanity and resources, such as time and money.
Can I run HomeAssistant in Kiosk mode on this thing? The only use case I can think of.
This is bullshit. Stop spreading misinformation.
Well, there's really no need to come up with such complicated (and not entirely accurate) analogies here. It's actually very simple. Paying Google is bad. Not paying is good. That's it.
> a*hole Asshole.
You're just mixing up completely different things and thinking you're saying something meaningful. In reality, you're just confusing yourself and those around you.
> Layer-3 only huh? 1.2.3.0/23 is a valid host address, it doesn't have to be Layer-3 only or whatever. it's just basic subnetting.
it is. It's incredibly funny to watch you try to avoid being associated with certain negative things, while at the same time they're doing exactly what, by definition, those things are - in the literal sense. at least…
Too late for that!
E.g. Netflix doesn't let you to stream 4k video in browser afaik. So no, it's not a good option.
Lol even after 6 days you haven't posted any supporting information, so who's misinforming here? :)
That's true. And that's exactly why we should blame Google's employees - they are the ones to blame for what's happening.
I don't disagree, but no one forces you to be a jerk. Don't act surprised when you receive a pushback for that.
I'm pretty sure there are some here on this forum as well. Fell free to log out and never come back.
Huh? From RFC1123: <quote> 2.1 Host Names and Numbers The syntax of a legal Internet host name was specified in RFC-952 [DNS:4]. One aspect of host name syntax is hereby changed: the restriction on the first character…
> Giving up a little privacy to stop thousands of murders of innocents is a trade-off im willing to make. That's disgusting.
I wonder how soon someone will leave a comment here saying something like, “Aaactually, this isn’t censorship.”
> I vehemently opposed it at the time, on principle, and got downvoted to heck for it. Thank you.
The Hacker News community didn’t see any problem at all in 2022 when NameCheap massively revoked the registrations of everyone with Russian passports. Everyone fervently supported this initiative, I remember it clearly.…
Don't you say. You don't even know what was that horrible treatment exactly - didn't even ask, why would you, right? - but you've promptly explained to the guy that it was his fucking fault - he's from the sanctioned…
There’s always someone willing to explain how sanctions work to those who are subject to them. Thank you for your work, sir. What would we do without you.
Sad. I actually have a storage box from Hetzner, let me open a test ticket to see how fast they react.
Have you ever contacted their support? I'm thinking about switching to Hetzner.
And why exactly is that the case? Why should I prioritize morality and empathy over my own well-being?
And that changes things how exactly? The problem is that American companies have been stealing our data for decades, not their ties to the government.
Such is the reality as we perceive it through our senses. Everyone has to put up with certain corrupt practices in order to preserve their sanity and resources, such as time and money.
Can I run HomeAssistant in Kiosk mode on this thing? The only use case I can think of.
This is bullshit. Stop spreading misinformation.
Well, there's really no need to come up with such complicated (and not entirely accurate) analogies here. It's actually very simple. Paying Google is bad. Not paying is good. That's it.
> a*hole Asshole.
You're just mixing up completely different things and thinking you're saying something meaningful. In reality, you're just confusing yourself and those around you.
> Layer-3 only huh? 1.2.3.0/23 is a valid host address, it doesn't have to be Layer-3 only or whatever. it's just basic subnetting.
it is. It's incredibly funny to watch you try to avoid being associated with certain negative things, while at the same time they're doing exactly what, by definition, those things are - in the literal sense. at least…
Too late for that!
E.g. Netflix doesn't let you to stream 4k video in browser afaik. So no, it's not a good option.
Lol even after 6 days you haven't posted any supporting information, so who's misinforming here? :)
That's true. And that's exactly why we should blame Google's employees - they are the ones to blame for what's happening.
I don't disagree, but no one forces you to be a jerk. Don't act surprised when you receive a pushback for that.
I'm pretty sure there are some here on this forum as well. Fell free to log out and never come back.
Huh? From RFC1123: <quote> 2.1 Host Names and Numbers The syntax of a legal Internet host name was specified in RFC-952 [DNS:4]. One aspect of host name syntax is hereby changed: the restriction on the first character…