Great! Just one thing: I see you are splitting by |, and some torrents (very few, but some) have | in their name (I didn't bother with escaping that).
I am thinking of releasing new versions once a week and putting the hash of the torrent of the newest version on some public site. (Say, some twitter account.) But it would still be more proof of concept than really…
The thing is, new torrents are uploaded to Pirate Bay all the time, so one can only archive TPB in any given moment - which has to be, of course, before the creation of this torrent. The archive is static, the TPB…
it's in sort-of chronological order originally (partially ordered is the correct term, I guess?) but not 100%
The magnets in the archive are already just the hashes to make it smaller.
Hello, I am an author of the scrape. I did it more to try it, but who knows, maybe it will be useful to someone. I went trough the description pages like http://thepiratebay.se/torrent/$i by increasing the $i and saving…
Great! Just one thing: I see you are splitting by |, and some torrents (very few, but some) have | in their name (I didn't bother with escaping that).
I am thinking of releasing new versions once a week and putting the hash of the torrent of the newest version on some public site. (Say, some twitter account.) But it would still be more proof of concept than really…
The thing is, new torrents are uploaded to Pirate Bay all the time, so one can only archive TPB in any given moment - which has to be, of course, before the creation of this torrent. The archive is static, the TPB…
it's in sort-of chronological order originally (partially ordered is the correct term, I guess?) but not 100%
The magnets in the archive are already just the hashes to make it smaller.
Hello, I am an author of the scrape. I did it more to try it, but who knows, maybe it will be useful to someone. I went trough the description pages like http://thepiratebay.se/torrent/$i by increasing the $i and saving…