Does your anarchism extend to the aforementioned left leaning foreign governments?
Oh this is hilarious. Not only do you confirm that you wouldn't support them doing what they choose to with their service in the absence of government intervention, you would actively support the same government…
No. The US government should stay out of other countries business’. They should even stay out of NATO. But again, I’m sure you don’t have that level of consistency.
I don’t support any government bullying of private companies, although I’m sure any level of consistency would be unfamiliar to people like you. Should TikTok be allowed to control what goes onto their service? That’s a…
TikTok is a private company and your use of their service is not a right.
So no, “it’s the law” doesn’t apply to you. Answer the question or I’ll answer it for you. Thanks for playing.
You are free to sacrifice your own privacy. This discussion is about whether you have the right to forcefully sacrifice mine. You’re only consistent in doing what benefits you, even if that means your support for a…
It’s how it works for people that lack consistency. If you don’t want absolute privacy then you are also free to support an absolute lack of it. “I want privacy except when it stops me from getting at other people’s…
Funny to see this make headlines here, where many people would gladly support using mass surveillance to fund the government. The same ones that support financial privacy restrictions are quick to play victim when the…
Compared to what? An equivalent framework costs more in Canada when you factor in a student discount.
I find it hilarious that you decided to respond to a single sentence out of my comment, and then proceeded to say exactly what I claimed you would say in the rest of my comment. If you can quantify the "indirect…
[flagged]
That’s correct, you pay for what you use and don’t pay for what you don’t. It’s irrelevant as to how much something someone else chose to do benefitted me. My lemonade stand doesn’t owe the cinema you decided to open up…
It should be neither. Taxes should be a service fee proportional to your usage of a government service. Income shouldn’t even be part of the equation. The USPS charges more if you want to ship heavier packages, not if…
This is an EU country. Their response to not liking your overreach is to make it illegal to complain, mantle it illegal to leave.
ok. Say we didn't have ICE. How will you now justify holding others at gunpoint to violate a contract you voluntarily signed while having the part that benefits you still enforced? Or is immigration the only thing you…
It doesn't matter what you consider yourself. Or who is doing to considering, despite your efforts to emphasize that. The proofs are math. We've already established that math is sound. This discussion is not about the…
What gun? I see only the one you’re asking to be pointed at others.
Sure thing. Then I'm sure you can evenly distribute seven marbles to four people, or make gold with alchemy. My prejudices must just be wrong.
It doesn't matter what they believed. Philosophy never involves rigorous proofs. By adding them you would just end up doing math. A partially finished proof is still math and not equivalent to 20 pages of worthless…
Criticizing philosophy is philosophy so it cannot be criticized, the classic philosopher get out of jail free card. Philosophy is absolutely nothing like math. Math can be proven. Math maps to physical quantities.…
Is it a fact that the United States is the most free country? Your index isn’t called “index of phones by number of parts replaceable”, just like mine isn’t called “index of countries by gun ownership”. Like I said, you…
And like before, if you isolate the philosophy in their work, it’s useless. Philosophy by a mathematician is still philosophy. There is a clear distinction between rigorous proofs and blathering about how people think,…
False hypotheses like the roundness of the Earth, or the existence of gravity, or the orbit around the sun? All of which have been denied in the past by philosophers and other pseudoscientists with cultural “proofs” to…
No, it isn’t. “Do you support privacy” is a yes or no question, not a “depends on for who” question.
Does your anarchism extend to the aforementioned left leaning foreign governments?
Oh this is hilarious. Not only do you confirm that you wouldn't support them doing what they choose to with their service in the absence of government intervention, you would actively support the same government…
No. The US government should stay out of other countries business’. They should even stay out of NATO. But again, I’m sure you don’t have that level of consistency.
I don’t support any government bullying of private companies, although I’m sure any level of consistency would be unfamiliar to people like you. Should TikTok be allowed to control what goes onto their service? That’s a…
TikTok is a private company and your use of their service is not a right.
So no, “it’s the law” doesn’t apply to you. Answer the question or I’ll answer it for you. Thanks for playing.
You are free to sacrifice your own privacy. This discussion is about whether you have the right to forcefully sacrifice mine. You’re only consistent in doing what benefits you, even if that means your support for a…
It’s how it works for people that lack consistency. If you don’t want absolute privacy then you are also free to support an absolute lack of it. “I want privacy except when it stops me from getting at other people’s…
Funny to see this make headlines here, where many people would gladly support using mass surveillance to fund the government. The same ones that support financial privacy restrictions are quick to play victim when the…
Compared to what? An equivalent framework costs more in Canada when you factor in a student discount.
I find it hilarious that you decided to respond to a single sentence out of my comment, and then proceeded to say exactly what I claimed you would say in the rest of my comment. If you can quantify the "indirect…
[flagged]
That’s correct, you pay for what you use and don’t pay for what you don’t. It’s irrelevant as to how much something someone else chose to do benefitted me. My lemonade stand doesn’t owe the cinema you decided to open up…
It should be neither. Taxes should be a service fee proportional to your usage of a government service. Income shouldn’t even be part of the equation. The USPS charges more if you want to ship heavier packages, not if…
This is an EU country. Their response to not liking your overreach is to make it illegal to complain, mantle it illegal to leave.
ok. Say we didn't have ICE. How will you now justify holding others at gunpoint to violate a contract you voluntarily signed while having the part that benefits you still enforced? Or is immigration the only thing you…
It doesn't matter what you consider yourself. Or who is doing to considering, despite your efforts to emphasize that. The proofs are math. We've already established that math is sound. This discussion is not about the…
What gun? I see only the one you’re asking to be pointed at others.
Sure thing. Then I'm sure you can evenly distribute seven marbles to four people, or make gold with alchemy. My prejudices must just be wrong.
It doesn't matter what they believed. Philosophy never involves rigorous proofs. By adding them you would just end up doing math. A partially finished proof is still math and not equivalent to 20 pages of worthless…
Criticizing philosophy is philosophy so it cannot be criticized, the classic philosopher get out of jail free card. Philosophy is absolutely nothing like math. Math can be proven. Math maps to physical quantities.…
Is it a fact that the United States is the most free country? Your index isn’t called “index of phones by number of parts replaceable”, just like mine isn’t called “index of countries by gun ownership”. Like I said, you…
And like before, if you isolate the philosophy in their work, it’s useless. Philosophy by a mathematician is still philosophy. There is a clear distinction between rigorous proofs and blathering about how people think,…
False hypotheses like the roundness of the Earth, or the existence of gravity, or the orbit around the sun? All of which have been denied in the past by philosophers and other pseudoscientists with cultural “proofs” to…
No, it isn’t. “Do you support privacy” is a yes or no question, not a “depends on for who” question.