I don't have experience with this area, but... > this would require that unions can work on the 'bit level' in packed structs Just as Zig has packed structs, it also has packed unions. So that part shouldn't be an issue.
Do you have any links about that? I did a quick search but didn't find anything substantial.
> so they would be avoided if we had non-movable/non-copyable types. There is a proposal for this that was accepted a while ago[0]. However, the devs have been focused on the self-hosted compiler recently, so they're…
it seems they changed it at some point. https://web.archive.org/web/20200624213857/https://design.gs... > c. The User may not use the Licensed Font Software to disparage or suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by…
(2019)
I'm pretty sure cloudflare has a service called "Workers" and that this doesn't literally mean that their employees support COBOL.
I don't have experience with this area, but... > this would require that unions can work on the 'bit level' in packed structs Just as Zig has packed structs, it also has packed unions. So that part shouldn't be an issue.
Do you have any links about that? I did a quick search but didn't find anything substantial.
> so they would be avoided if we had non-movable/non-copyable types. There is a proposal for this that was accepted a while ago[0]. However, the devs have been focused on the self-hosted compiler recently, so they're…
it seems they changed it at some point. https://web.archive.org/web/20200624213857/https://design.gs... > c. The User may not use the Licensed Font Software to disparage or suggest any affiliation with or endorsement by…
(2019)
I'm pretty sure cloudflare has a service called "Workers" and that this doesn't literally mean that their employees support COBOL.