That's the fallacy Google and Netflix used to push DRM into your proprietary GoogleChrome and open source GoogleChromium/MozillaFirefox browsers. whatever helps you sleep at night...
> Google for HTTP/2, Chrome, Web Vitals, Angular and so many other puzzle pieces without which the whole Internet wouldn't be what it is today. It showed foresight, wisdom, excellence, responsibility and stewardship.…
QR should look MORE like QR, and always include an URL next to it. If you display a QR Code with some url, and fail to show a shortened url next to it for people to type instead of scanning, you either fail basic common…
they will use k-a for admin traffic and k-u for user data, same as one of the 5G types, which I believe is non-regulated. So, i guess it is as legal as the interference themselves will cause on your 5g phone reception.
Most important point everyone forgets to mention: this is NOT about having the tech or not. We have artificial satellites for a very long time. This is about spending a few dollars more to have them properly painted.…
<quote> Preventative Mitigations NOTE: The mitigations that follow are not meant to protect against the initial access vector. The mitigations are designed to prevent Drovorub’s persistence and hiding technique only.…
yet another name for documentation nobody will write, but the manager will be able to say "solved the lack of documentation this quarter by implementing XYZ".
i used the form and emailed abuse@ (for sites blatantly impersonating relief effort organizations at the onset of covid-19) all attempts got responses like "cool, but we don't do any of that. please contact google…
> Firefox market share is almost negligible because it wasn't the default browser on mobile OS's "Working on the browser" includes allying with ACLU/EFF/etc to sue google/apple, just like Google itself sued microsoft…
> (assuming employee lack of ability/tools) It's part of our data verification policy That's a silly proposition. sounds like you need to learn about hashing and signatures...
Why would they include stuff from proprietary releases? I understand exposing backdoors and all, but who cares about a camera firmware for a airgaped system? wonder if some of the clients for those devices is involved…
That's the fallacy Google and Netflix used to push DRM into your proprietary GoogleChrome and open source GoogleChromium/MozillaFirefox browsers. whatever helps you sleep at night...
> Google for HTTP/2, Chrome, Web Vitals, Angular and so many other puzzle pieces without which the whole Internet wouldn't be what it is today. It showed foresight, wisdom, excellence, responsibility and stewardship.…
QR should look MORE like QR, and always include an URL next to it. If you display a QR Code with some url, and fail to show a shortened url next to it for people to type instead of scanning, you either fail basic common…
they will use k-a for admin traffic and k-u for user data, same as one of the 5G types, which I believe is non-regulated. So, i guess it is as legal as the interference themselves will cause on your 5g phone reception.
Most important point everyone forgets to mention: this is NOT about having the tech or not. We have artificial satellites for a very long time. This is about spending a few dollars more to have them properly painted.…
<quote> Preventative Mitigations NOTE: The mitigations that follow are not meant to protect against the initial access vector. The mitigations are designed to prevent Drovorub’s persistence and hiding technique only.…
yet another name for documentation nobody will write, but the manager will be able to say "solved the lack of documentation this quarter by implementing XYZ".
i used the form and emailed abuse@ (for sites blatantly impersonating relief effort organizations at the onset of covid-19) all attempts got responses like "cool, but we don't do any of that. please contact google…
> Firefox market share is almost negligible because it wasn't the default browser on mobile OS's "Working on the browser" includes allying with ACLU/EFF/etc to sue google/apple, just like Google itself sued microsoft…
> (assuming employee lack of ability/tools) It's part of our data verification policy That's a silly proposition. sounds like you need to learn about hashing and signatures...
Why would they include stuff from proprietary releases? I understand exposing backdoors and all, but who cares about a camera firmware for a airgaped system? wonder if some of the clients for those devices is involved…