altogethernow23
No user record in our sample, but altogethernow23 has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
No user record in our sample, but altogethernow23 has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
This is interesting - I think there is a perception that just doing okay is somehow the same as failing. If you can’t be the richest, then nothing else is good enough and dropping out is the better option. It’s a bummer.
I’m not citing a wage gap. I’m just citing the numbers from the department of labor. They’re just numbers and you can’t debunk numbers. Can you please cite… anything… to support your argument that “men” as a group are…
There was a lot about this article that was intellectually lazy. It barely qualified as journalism. One stat about suicide without looking at any confounding factors or other correlations? Talk about a hack job.
What bleeding? Those three guys in the article do not constitute “bleeding.”
Which statistics? You’ve literally cited none. Statistically speaking, let’s look at the data: - salary wise, men are still paid more in every profession (even those that are considered “traditionally female”). - Men…
That’s not really what’s at stake here though is it. it would take a HUGE structural shift for men to go from “less actively recruited to be in STEM than before” to “being in jail and on drugs.”
You think encouraging more people to become more interested in jobs that are essentially the future of civilization is “nonsense”? Don’t you think that’s odd?
[flagged]
Boys, as a group, are actually doing just fine for themselves - STEM programs or no STEM programs. That article does nothing to indicate otherwise.
[flagged]