Agreed, though I've found Seneca's letters to be more insightful (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistulae_Morales_ad_Lucilium), as well as the The Enchiridion (http://classics.mit.edu/Epictetus/epicench.html).
I can appreciate the idea that one's work can (potentially) function as a superior alternative to children, with respect to legacy. In general, I'm all for elevating the rational part of Human mind. On the other hand, I…
> Anyway, if you're choosing to have kids, one is enough. The real winners adopt. Not from an evolutionary standpoint, lol
Life is meant to be lived. A tautology at best, but more likely empty rhetoric. Make healthier choices, but still enjoy. This assumes healthy choices cannot produce enjoyment. Otherwise, what's the point? In our modern…
Of course it was harmful, you were focusing on the wrong thing. The point of having methods with no more than [insert number] lines isn't because having a method with more than [insert number] lines is inherently bad.…
Agreed, though I've found Seneca's letters to be more insightful (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistulae_Morales_ad_Lucilium), as well as the The Enchiridion (http://classics.mit.edu/Epictetus/epicench.html).
I can appreciate the idea that one's work can (potentially) function as a superior alternative to children, with respect to legacy. In general, I'm all for elevating the rational part of Human mind. On the other hand, I…
> Anyway, if you're choosing to have kids, one is enough. The real winners adopt. Not from an evolutionary standpoint, lol
Life is meant to be lived. A tautology at best, but more likely empty rhetoric. Make healthier choices, but still enjoy. This assumes healthy choices cannot produce enjoyment. Otherwise, what's the point? In our modern…
Of course it was harmful, you were focusing on the wrong thing. The point of having methods with no more than [insert number] lines isn't because having a method with more than [insert number] lines is inherently bad.…