Silly yourself. If there were simply a "non-zero" number of charts in them, the model wouldn't have, you know, modelled them. That the model can reproduce graphs is clear evidence that it saw enough graphs to reproduce…
Hah. That could be a great way to use those models. "Talk to the AI until you know what you want, then I'll make it for you". I'm totally with your wife, btw, the attitude of her customers sounds horrible. On the other…
If I understand your interpretation correctly, you wouldn't expect it to generate anything else precise, either. For instance, you wouldn't expect it to be able to generate the precise contours of a face, correct?
What you said was that they weren't trained on chart images, not that they weren't the focus: > The image generation models weren't trained on chart images, everyone already knows they're gonna be bad at that. I have no…
Isn't yours just a bad faith comment? Why would I not have clicked the link?
We already know what those models are good at. Everybody keeps posting their cherry-picked good results. Why not get the chance to see some failures, too? Isn't it interesting to know what those models are bad at?…
Wait, why is this the wrong comparison? Where does it say that those models can't generate graphs? Why is everyone so sure that this is not one of the intended applications of image generation? Who made up those rules…
This is what it should look like: https://www.bdaddik.com/en/comics-collectible-postcards/2967... Modulo s/Lucky Luke/astronaut/g Note that the image above should be in Dall-E's training set. So it's seen how a horse…
After reading your comment I asked Stable Diffusion to create photorealistic images of a graph with three lines (similar to the smallest prompt in the article). Here's the results of three attempts with slightly…
OK, so people complain that Stable Diffusion and friends are trained on art so it's not fair to ask them to produce graphs because graphs are not art. So I asked them to produce artistic graphs. Here are the results of…
Silly yourself. If there were simply a "non-zero" number of charts in them, the model wouldn't have, you know, modelled them. That the model can reproduce graphs is clear evidence that it saw enough graphs to reproduce…
Hah. That could be a great way to use those models. "Talk to the AI until you know what you want, then I'll make it for you". I'm totally with your wife, btw, the attitude of her customers sounds horrible. On the other…
If I understand your interpretation correctly, you wouldn't expect it to generate anything else precise, either. For instance, you wouldn't expect it to be able to generate the precise contours of a face, correct?
What you said was that they weren't trained on chart images, not that they weren't the focus: > The image generation models weren't trained on chart images, everyone already knows they're gonna be bad at that. I have no…
Isn't yours just a bad faith comment? Why would I not have clicked the link?
We already know what those models are good at. Everybody keeps posting their cherry-picked good results. Why not get the chance to see some failures, too? Isn't it interesting to know what those models are bad at?…
Wait, why is this the wrong comparison? Where does it say that those models can't generate graphs? Why is everyone so sure that this is not one of the intended applications of image generation? Who made up those rules…
This is what it should look like: https://www.bdaddik.com/en/comics-collectible-postcards/2967... Modulo s/Lucky Luke/astronaut/g Note that the image above should be in Dall-E's training set. So it's seen how a horse…
After reading your comment I asked Stable Diffusion to create photorealistic images of a graph with three lines (similar to the smallest prompt in the article). Here's the results of three attempts with slightly…
OK, so people complain that Stable Diffusion and friends are trained on art so it's not fair to ask them to produce graphs because graphs are not art. So I asked them to produce artistic graphs. Here are the results of…