> Absolutely zero bullshit features installed and never changes things on its own. That's it. For me, that's [unfortunately] the only "realistic" alternative out there, if one wouldn't mind the extra bucks, is somehow…
Is using server editions of Windows as desktop OSs any better? I mean in regards to making such changes (without explicit user's consent, at least) and wasting system resources with [background running] junkware, for…
A bit out of context, but I would really appreciate some explanation/answers here. Has anyone shared some sort of analysis of external/community contributions to Hashicorp's OSS products, following their licensing…
That's clever!
China, I guess.
> Absolutely zero bullshit features installed and never changes things on its own. That's it. For me, that's [unfortunately] the only "realistic" alternative out there, if one wouldn't mind the extra bucks, is somehow…
Is using server editions of Windows as desktop OSs any better? I mean in regards to making such changes (without explicit user's consent, at least) and wasting system resources with [background running] junkware, for…
A bit out of context, but I would really appreciate some explanation/answers here. Has anyone shared some sort of analysis of external/community contributions to Hashicorp's OSS products, following their licensing…
That's clever!
China, I guess.